If it’s rape, call it rape

An inter­est­ing arti­cle by the pub­lic edi­tor of the New York Times, Arthur S. Bris­bane, in response to com­plaints he received about how the Times’ han­dled descrip­tions of the alle­ga­tions against Jerry Sandusky.

Some read­ers, respond­ing to The New York Times’s first reports on the case, strongly objected to word­ing in the arti­cles that, in their view, either under­played the details or wrongly applied the lan­guage of con­sen­sual sex to the narrative.

One reader, for exam­ple, objected to the phrase “sex­ual assault,” sug­gest­ing it served to make Sandusky’s alleged rape of a 10-year-old boy invis­i­ble. Another pointed out that the phrase “hav­ing anal sex with” to describe what San­dusky was doing to that boy implied con­sent on the boy’s part and so also served to make the alleged rape vanish.

Brisbane’s take on all this is worth read­ing, and I like his con­clu­sion, “When the facts war­rant it, jour­nal­ists should be as spe­cific as pos­si­ble, they should avoid using the lan­guage of con­sen­sual sex and, when appro­pri­ate, they should call a rape a rape.” What I found most inter­est­ing about the arti­cle, though, was this:

[Wendy Mur­phy, an adjunct pro­fes­sor at the New Eng­land School of Law] said that in sur­vey­ing the 50 states, she found “some­thing like 40 dif­fer­ent terms to describe the act of rape of a child.”

It’s hard for me to imag­ine that, but then, as Bris­bane points out:

“Rape” is a word in flux. The Times style­book says to use it to mean “forced inter­course, or inter­course with a child below the age of con­sent.” In many cases, though, the jus­tice sys­tem doesn’t use the word. In the San­dusky case, the charges do not include the word “rape” because he was charged under the statute cov­er­ing “Invol­un­tary Devi­ate Sex­ual Intercourse.”

“Why I Am A Feminist Man” Published by The Scavenger

I have been away from any really sub­stan­tive blog­ging, or work on my other writ­ing projects, since my grand­mother died because I’ve been busy catch­ing up on every­thing that accu­mu­lated on my desk, work-related and oth­er­wise, while I was deal­ing with her death. I had hoped to start doing some writ­ing this past week­end, but we found out on Fri­day that the admin­is­tra­tion at the col­lege where I teach fired all 66 full-time fac­ulty on tem­po­rary lines, which is the equiv­a­lent of almost 10% of full-timers. Nine of those lines have since been restored, but, as you can imag­ine, the news was demor­al­iz­ing in the extreme, and so it will take me till the end of this week – tomor­row, actu­ally – to fin­ish with my grad­ing and all, and I will be able to get back to my own writ­ing next week. Mean­while, I am excited by the fact that the Aus­tralian online pub­li­ca­tion The Scav­enger has cho­sen to repub­lish my essay Why I Am a Fem­i­nist Man, which orig­i­nally came out on The Take­back.

Fragments of Evolving Manhood: Why I Am a Feminist Man

The first time the old man who lived in the apart­ment at the top of the stair­case said hello to me, he stopped for a moment as we passed in the court­yard and smiled as if he’d known me my whole life. The sec­ond time, he did the same thing. By the third or fourth time, a rit­ual of greet­ing had grown between us. When­ever we saw each other, he would smile and say hello first; I would smile, say the same thing back, and then, for a long silent moment, he would fix me with his gaze while I stood there, too hap­pily embar­rassed to move, wish­ing when he walked away that I’d done some­thing, any­thing, to pro­long our conversation.

I think of him as “the old man” because of how young I was when I met him — I was thir­teen — but he was prob­a­bly not much older than the forty-nine-years-old I am now, if that old, and so he was the per­fect age for me to see in him a pos­si­ble sur­ro­gate father. My par­ents had sep­a­rated when I was three; my step­fa­ther had recently left us; and I was des­per­ate for some kind of pater­nal atten­tion and approval. So I was thrilled when the old man one day in late sum­mer did not keep walk­ing after our usual exchange, ask­ing me instead, “When am I going to see you?”

I fig­ured he was lonely, like Mrs. Schecht­man had been when she lived in the apart­ment next to his, and the thought of vis­it­ing with him like I used to visit with her made me happy. “Soon!” I answered.

Not too long after­wards, I was on my way out of our build­ing to meet my friends. The old man hap­pened to be walk­ing down the stair­case lead­ing from his apart­ment to the front door, which we reached at the same time. As I went to turn the knob, he held the door shut with his left fore­arm, maneu­ver­ing me with his right till I stood face first in the cor­ner near the mail­boxes where the door frame met the wall. Cov­er­ing my body with his own, he ran his hands beneath my shirt and up the legs of my shorts; he groped my chest and belly, squeezed my butt, cupped my crotch, and he kept whis­per­ing hoarsely into my ear, over and over again, “When am I going to see you?”

I had no words for what he was doing, no train­ing such as young chil­dren get now in how to scream no! to scare off an attacker. All I could do was stand there till he was fin­ished; and when he was fin­ished, I ran. I don’t remem­ber how far or how long or in which direc­tion, but I ran as if I could leave my skin behind, as if run­ning would turn me into another per­son. When I stopped run­ning, in the small park across the street from the Lutheran Church, I sat a long time with the knowl­edge that my run­ning had undone noth­ing, that my body was still the body he’d touched.

Even if I’d wanted to tell some­one — and I didn’t — I was sure no one would believe me, so I pre­tended noth­ing had hap­pened. When the old man passed me the next day and said hello, I said hello back the way I always did, forc­ing myself not to see the ironic twist he added to his smile. After a cou­ple of more times, our hel­los began to feel nor­mal again, and I told myself that maybe it hadn’t hap­pened. Maybe he was just a lonely old man who liked to say hello, and as long as he stayed on his side of that hello, I felt — or, to be more accu­rate, I con­vinced myself that I was — safe.

Some weeks later, as I sat with my friends in front of our build­ing, the old man came home from food shop­ping and asked me to help him upstairs with the bags in his shop­ping cart. I wanted to say no, but I couldn’t. To do so would almost cer­tainly have raised ques­tions for my friends about why I was being so rude, and the last thing I wanted to do was explain myself to them. So I took the bag he pointed to and fol­lowed him up to his apart­ment, where he opened the door and motioned me in ahead of him. The bag was heavy, so I stepped inside, think­ing I’d leave it by the door and get out as quickly as I could, but he was too fast for me. As soon as the door shut behind him, he pushed the shop­ping cart to the side, took the bag from my arms and dropped it to the floor. The cans at the bot­tom landed with a crash that shook the whole apart­ment. Snaking his arms around my waist, he undid my belt and unzipped my pants, push­ing them down so they fell around my ankles. All I could do was stand there, frozen to the spot where my feet had stopped mov­ing. He took me by the hand and led me to the couch against the wall. He sat down. Look­ing up at me with a wide smile — I have the dis­tinct mem­ory that he’d taken out his two front teeth — his eyes, at what I imag­ine must have been the fear in mine, grew ten­der. “You’ve never had a blowjob before, have you?” When I shook my head no, his voice filled with con­cern. “But don’t you want me to love you?”

In the silence with which I responded, he took my penis in his hands — I remem­ber think­ing his fin­gers were like a cage — and he told me how good it was, how beau­ti­ful and big, and then his own pants were down, and I was sit­ting on the couch, and his penis, large and pur­ple, hung in front of my face. His voice came from some­where above me, urg­ing me to play with it, at least to touch it, and I don’t remem­ber if I did — no, at this point, my mem­ory goes white, like the blank space in a video of which a por­tion has been erased, though I can still feel his hands on the back of my head. Then I see myself walk­ing to the door, unlock­ing it, clos­ing it behind me, and some­how I am next in my bed, curled in the fetal posi­tion, where I stay until my mother calls me for dinner.

The next day, the old man saw me stand­ing by myself in front of our build­ing. He didn’t come close, just stood some dis­tance away and pleaded with me to go upstairs with him again. This time, he promised, would be dif­fer­ent. He would move more slowly, be more gen­tle. I said no, ignor­ing his fur­ther pleas until he left me alone, which he did for the rest of the time he lived in our build­ing. I still nod­ded in recog­ni­tion if I was with some­one when he saw me — I did not want any­one won­der­ing why I didn’t — but oth­er­wise I did my best to ignore him, and he seemed con­tent to ignore me as well. Even­tu­ally, he moved away, and what he’d done to me receded even fur­ther into the silence I’d wrapped it in, and I pulled that silence around me like a pro­tec­tive cloak. No one else ever had to know.

The fab­ric of my silence started to fray when, at nine­teen years old, I read Adri­enne Rich’s On Lies, Secrets and Silence. At the time, I was inter­ested in Rich as a poet; I knew noth­ing about her as a fem­i­nist. Indeed, fem­i­nism itself was barely on my radar as some­thing with a sub­stan­tive rel­e­vance to my life, and so I was sur­prised to find myself enthralled and ener­gized by the polit­i­cal and explic­itly woman-centered con­tent of what I was read­ing. Then I came to this pas­sage from “Cary­atid: Two Columns:”

[T]aught to view our bod­ies as our total­ity, our gen­i­tals as our chief source of fas­ci­na­tion and value, many women have become dis­so­ci­ated from their own bodies…viewing them­selves as objects to be pos­sessed by men rather than as the sub­jects of an existence.

As soon as I read those words, a small voice in my head began to speak. “But what about me?” it wanted to know. “What about what hap­pened to me?” I sought out other fem­i­nist texts and read vora­ciously, dis­cov­er­ing in the fem­i­nist analy­sis of men’s sex­ual vio­lence against women a vocab­u­lary for nam­ing what the old man in my build­ing had done to me as the vio­la­tion it was. More impor­tantly, though, being able to name what he did made it pos­si­ble for me to tell oth­ers, and when telling them did not bring the roof of the world crash­ing down around my head, I found the strength I needed to con­front my abuse more fully by going to coun­sel­ing. In a very real sense, then, I owe to fem­i­nism what­ever heal­ing I have achieved.

If I stopped here, even those of you totally opposed to fem­i­nism would prob­a­bly be nod­ding your heads. “Of course you’re a fem­i­nist. It makes per­fect sense.” Yet to stop here would be to reduce fem­i­nism to a kind of self-help ide­ol­ogy, implic­itly deny­ing that fem­i­nism is also a pol­i­tics. More to the point, it would be to gloss over the fact that com­mit­ting myself to those pol­i­tics has been part and par­cel of my healing.

Not too long after I first read Adri­enne Rich’s essay, I was work­ing as a sum­mer camp super­vi­sor in New York’s Hud­son Val­ley. The leader of a train­ing ses­sion we were required to attend told us he would use the word she as the generic pro­noun when dis­cussing how to deal with campers who might choose to tell us that they’d been sex­u­ally abused. Since most abuse hap­pened to girls, he explained, refer­ring to both boys and girls as vic­tims would give us a skewed pic­ture of real­ity, mak­ing it dif­fi­cult for us to respond appro­pri­ately. I felt like I’d been punched in the stom­ach. It wasn’t just that he so blithely dis­missed my expe­ri­ence. What he said seemed to imply that the sex­ual abuse of boys and the sex­ual abuse of girls were so rad­i­cally dif­fer­ent in nature that we could not talk about them in the same con­text. If that were true, it called into ques­tion every­thing I thought I’d been learn­ing from fem­i­nism, sug­gest­ing that the strength I’d been draw­ing from that learn­ing was based on a false premise.

My body rebelled at this idea. Each time I tried to tell myself that the ses­sion leader was right — because the weight of his exper­tise made it hard to think he wasn’t — I wanted to crawl out of my skin no dif­fer­ently than I had after the first time the old man in my build­ing touched me. Still, there was no deny­ing that the books I was read­ing said not one word about my expe­ri­ence. Girls and women were abused and exploited in those pages, not boys, and cer­tainly not men. I’d found myself in Rich’s essay, in other words, as well as in the other fem­i­nists texts I was read­ing, through a process of anal­ogy. To take another instance from “Cary­atid: Two Columns,” when Rich wrote about how the val­ues of our cul­ture “equat[e]…manhood…with the objec­ti­fi­ca­tion of another’s per­son and the dom­i­na­tion of another’s body,” I under­stood her to be describ­ing, with a chill­ing accu­racy, what the old man in my build­ing had done to me, even though she was talk­ing explic­itly about men’s sex­ual objec­ti­fi­ca­tion of women.

This anal­ogy only grew stronger as I began to see very pre­cise par­al­lels between the old man’s method of “seduc­ing” me — because that’s what I think he thought he was doing – and the meth­ods for get­ting women into bed that some of my male friends talked about using. I remem­ber, for exam­ple, a dorm room con­ver­sa­tion from when I was an under­grad­u­ate. The “stud” among us – call him Liam – was talk­ing about the kind of women with whom sex­ual suc­cess mat­tered to him the most. These were, he said, the women who resisted, the ones who made him work for it, forc­ing him to prove that he could bend them to his will — I think he actu­ally used those words — because get­ting them to have sex with him made him feel most like a man. As Liam described how he sized such women up, I sud­denly real­ized that the old man in my build­ing had sized me up as well, that he had to have been watch­ing me before the first time he said hello. I was a shy, awk­ward and needy kid, so he gave me the kind of atten­tion that would make me feel noticed and that I would there­fore want more of. Liam talked about this as the “stage of flat­tery.” Then, once the old man could see in me a grow­ing desire for his atten­tion, he must have assumed that I also desired (per­haps with­out real­iz­ing it) every­thing else he wanted to “give” me as well. Accord­ing to Liam, a woman who resisted at this stage really wanted sex but was afraid of being labeled “easy.” She needed to be “taken,” he said, so she could give up her self con­trol with­out feel­ing guilty. Fol­low­ing what I am sure was a sim­i­lar logic, the old man used the force he thought was nec­es­sary to push me past the fear he believed was keep­ing me from express­ing my true desire. How else to explain the ques­tion he asked me before my mem­ory goes blank, “But don’t you want me to love you?”

Iron­i­cally, this par­al­lel between the two men was com­fort­ing. It affirmed for me that there was no rea­son to believe my expe­ri­ence of abuse dif­fered in any essen­tial way from the expe­ri­ence of a girl or woman whom a man had sim­i­larly vio­lated. The ses­sion leader had to have been wrong. Yet there was also no avoid­ing the fact that the fem­i­nists I was read­ing placed me as a man in the same cat­e­gory as the two men I have been talk­ing about. Here, again, from “Cary­atid: Two Columns,” is Adri­enne Rich:

Rape is the ulti­mate out­ward phys­i­cal act of coer­cion and deper­son­al­iza­tion prac­ticed on women by men. Most male readers…would per­haps deny hav­ing gone so far: the hon­est would admit to fan­tasies, urges of lust and hatred, or lust and fear, or to a “harm­less” fas­ci­na­tion with pornog­ra­phy and sadis­tic art.

I was fas­ci­nated by pornog­ra­phy; I had fan­tasies that com­bined lust and fear; and it was impos­si­ble to miss the cyn­i­cal accu­sa­tion in Rich’s use of the word “per­haps.” More tellingly, though, and damn­ingly, I had to admit that when Liam explained what it took for him to feel sex­u­ally like a man, I could not help but mea­sure myself against the stan­dard he set. I didn’t have a girl­friend at the time, and I wasn’t hav­ing sex, and I’d be lying if I said that didn’t some­times make me feel inad­e­quate. How­ever, it was only after I met a woman who rejected me because I was not “man enough” in pre­cisely Liam’s terms that I began to under­stand how fully the sex­ual val­ues to which he sub­scribed were also val­ues I had in me, whether I wanted them or not.

I met “Ling” through one of her suit­e­m­ates, “Denise,” who sat next to me in the class I was tak­ing on Shakespeare’s come­dies. The three of us spent an after­noon talk­ing and jok­ing in the library when we were sup­posed to be study­ing, and we hit it off so well that soon I was walk­ing across cam­pus a cou­ple of times a week to hang out with them and “Naomi,” the third woman with whom they lived. Some­times, if I stayed too late, I’d sleep on the couch in their suite and go back to my own dorm in the morn­ing. One such night, Ling and I stayed up talk­ing on that couch. I don’t remem­ber a sin­gle thing we said except for the fact that she told me about her expe­ri­ence emi­grat­ing as a young girl from China to the United States, but I know I felt good as I walked back to my dorm the next morn­ing. I liked Ling a lot, and I hoped that our talk­ing might lead to a roman­tic relationship.

The day after that, I saw Ling on cam­pus walk­ing with Naomi past the library. I called out to them and ran over to say hello. Instead of say­ing hello back, how­ever, they started mock­ing me, call­ing me “lit­tle boy” and “cow­ard.” I couldn’t imag­ine they were doing any­thing other than jok­ing with me, so I started to laugh with them. When I tried to ask Ling how she did on the test she’d had that morn­ing, though, the two women backed away, laugh­ing even harder and hold­ing up their hands to tell me I shouldn’t come any closer. I was con­fused. I called that night, but Denise told me Ling wasn’t there and that it would prob­a­bly be a good idea if I didn’t call again. Ling had been very insulted that not once dur­ing the time we were talk­ing on the couch did I even try to kiss her. I called a cou­ple of more times after that, hop­ing I’d be able to tell Ling how much I really did like her, but the one time I got her on the phone she was so clearly not inter­ested in talk­ing to me that I stopped call­ing. I nei­ther saw nor spoke to her again.

I was heart­bro­ken. More than that, though, I was angry and ashamed. I replayed the whole night over and over in my mind, try­ing to fig­ure out which raised eye­brow or touch on my arm or sig­nif­i­cant gaze I should have under­stood as Ling’s cue that it was time for me to kiss her. I just could not see what she clearly thought should have been obvi­ous. I tried to imag­ine how the night might have gone dif­fer­ently, cre­at­ing a sce­nario in which I leaned over and kissed Ling gen­tly at the edge of her mouth, as if I’d been aim­ing for her cheek and missed. She sat back, looked at me for a long moment, and then, of course, kissed me in return. Each time I played this scene in my head, how­ever, my anger and shame only increased. I still didn’t under­stand how I was sup­posed to have known that Ling wanted me to kiss her. As my sense of inad­e­quacy grew, the sting of Ling’s mock­ery grew as well, and I started to think that maybe I was indeed no bet­ter than the weak, cow­ardly and inef­fec­tual lit­tle boy she and her friend had told me that I was.

Once again, though, my body rebelled, and a nau­sea rose in me. Instead of mak­ing me want to crawl out of my own skin, though, this nau­sea was accom­pa­nied by a rage that pro­pelled me past Ling’s skin and into her body. Now, in the scenes I played in my head, I saw myself “tak­ing her” the way Liam had described “tak­ing” women who were afraid of seem­ing too “easy,” except I didn’t real­ize I was fol­low­ing Liam’s script. Then, once, as I imag­ined myself putting my hands on either side of Ling’s face to hold her still while I kissed her, I had a sense mem­ory of the old man in my build­ing putting his hands on the back of my head to pull my mouth towards him. I was mor­ti­fied. I spent the rest of that day alone, try­ing every­thing I could think of to twist what I had imag­ined into a shape that was not what it was: pre­cisely the kind of rape fan­tasy that Adri­enne Rich had writ­ten about. The fact that Ling might truly have wanted me to “take her” — whatever “tak­ing” might have meant to her — was beside the point. What mat­tered was that I’d imag­ined myself “tak­ing her” out of rage, to prove I was a man, not in response to any­thing I knew about Ling’s actual feel­ings or desires. In Rich’s words, I had “equat[ed my]…manhood…with the objec­ti­fi­ca­tion of another’s per­son and the dom­i­na­tion of another’s body.”

I swore I would do every­thing in my power to unlearn that equation.

At the heart of my fem­i­nism, then, is a para­dox. On the one hand, as a sur­vivor of male sex­ual vio­lence, I stand with women against the cul­ture of man­hood which pro­duces that vio­lence and which the vio­lence in turn per­pet­u­ates. On the other hand, as a man, I am — I have no choice but to be — impli­cated in that vio­lence. The chal­lenge with which fem­i­nism con­fronts me is to make sure that I never allow myself to stand on the same side as my abuser. Meet­ing this chal­lenge has not been easy. It is often uncom­fort­able to call other men out on their sex­ism; and it can be sim­i­larly uncom­fort­able when some­one calls me out on mine. Per­haps the most dif­fi­cult thing, how­ever, has been resist­ing the temp­ta­tion to wear my sex­ual abuse as a badge of dif­fer­ence, as if hav­ing been forcibly pen­e­trated by another man — because I am con­vinced that what I can­not fully remem­ber did in fact hap­pen — had some­how emp­tied me of the man­hood I was try­ing to prove in my fan­tasy with Ling, the same man­hood that Liam val­ued so highly and that is at the root of male sex­ual violence.

Because I have been coerced into the posi­tion that this kind of man­hood usu­ally reserves for women, in other words, it is easy to feel that my rela­tion­ship to this man­hood is essen­tially the same as a woman’s. Yet what­ever else may be true about the fact that I was sex­u­ally abused, the social and cul­tural con­text in which that abuse exists does not por­tray either the boy I was or the man I am as a sex­ual object in the way that it per­va­sively por­trays women. Nor am I sub­jected to the daily depre­da­tions of misog­yny and dis­crim­i­na­tion, indi­vid­ual and insti­tu­tional, that women expe­ri­ence because of their sta­tus as sex­ual objects. Finally, because I am a het­ero­sex­ual man, there is no escap­ing the fact that both the plea­sure this objec­ti­fi­ca­tion is designed to deliver and the advan­tages it is sup­posed to con­fer are meant quite explic­itly for me.

It is, in other words, as if there are two voices speak­ing within me: the voice of the man who is try­ing to own up to and change the cul­ture of male sex­ual vio­lence and the voice of the man who, as that culture’s vic­tim, feels like he has noth­ing to own up to. Inte­grat­ing these two voices has been the defin­ing chal­lenge of my life, per­son­ally, pro­fes­sion­ally and cre­atively. I called my first book of poetry The Silence of Men because I was break­ing the silence in my life that had resulted from keep­ing these two voices sep­a­rate. More, I hoped my poems would speak to and for men whose lives were shot through with a sim­i­lar silence. Writ­ing essays like this one also lets each of the men inside me have his say, allow­ing me to speak about what the old man in my build­ing did to me, while still doing jus­tice to the com­plex rela­tion­ship between who I am because of what he did and the man I have been taught I am sup­posed to be.

Fem­i­nism showed me how to con­nect the old man’s inhu­man­ity to the inhu­man­ity of what I have been taught; and fem­i­nism is the only pol­i­tics I can name that explic­itly com­mits itself to a world in which that kind of inhu­man­ity is no longer accept­able. That is why I am a fem­i­nist man.

Cross posted from The Take­back.

Husband Murder on the Rise in Iran

Saba Vasefi is an Iran­ian women’s and children’s rights activist who is now liv­ing in Aus­tralia. Her doc­u­men­tary, Do Not Bury My Heart–for which I have not been able to find much infor­ma­tion on the web – about the exe­cu­tion of minors in Iran was screened recently in the under­ground doc­u­men­tary sec­tion of the Copen­hagen Inter­na­tional Doc­u­men­tary Fes­ti­val. She’s writ­ten an arti­cle, which I found on the Tehran Bureau web­site and which was orig­i­nally pub­lished in Mianeh, about the increase in Iran of the num­ber of women accused of mur­der­ing their hus­bands. “This is,” she writes, “a sig­nif­i­cant shift in Iran­ian soci­ety, where mur­ders involv­ing spouses have in the past almost always involved men killing women, often in what is known as an ‘hon­our crime.’” More­over, these mur­ders are usu­ally, nom­i­nally, legal since “Arti­cle 630 of Iran’s Islam-based crim­i­nal code makes it legal for a man to kill both his wife and her part­ner if he finds them in the act, and it is con­sen­sual.” This bur­den of proof, she goes on to say, “is rarely met,” with most honor killings being more about “jeal­ousy, sus­pi­cion or merely a way of end­ing a marriage.”

One of the things I found most inter­est­ing about Vasefi’s arti­cle is the dif­fer­ence between what her research reveals about women who’ve been accused of mur­der­ing their hus­bands and what the avail­able research says.

In the case of wives who kill their hus­bands, the avail­able research indi­cates that two-thirds of cases are moti­vated by a desire for revenge for the hus­band being unfaithful.

The sur­vey that Moaz­zami and Ashouri con­ducted across 15 provinces of Iran showed that in 58 per­cent of cases, the women had been unable to get a divorce because their hus­bands or fam­i­lies would not agree to it, or had chil­dren and would have had no means of sup­port­ing them­selves if they had sep­a­rated from their spouses.

My own research indi­cates that many women who resort to vio­lence are them­selves vic­tims of abuse, and have been unable to find jus­tice through the legal system.

She points out that many of the women who mur­der their hus­bands fit the same pro­file: they are poor, rel­a­tively une­d­u­cated, often forced into mar­riage at an early age to men who are much older than they are, cir­cum­stances which com­bine to make much more dif­fi­cult for them to get help through the legal sys­tem or to find other ways out of their sit­u­a­tion. Mur­der is, for them, “a last act of desperation.”

Akram Mah­davi, one of the women Vasefi inter­viewed, is in Rajayi Shahr prison under a sus­pended death sen­tence for hir­ing a man to kill her hus­band, whom her father had forced her to marry – she was 20 and her hus­band was 75. Her motive? That she’d dis­cov­ered her hus­band was sex­u­ally abus­ing her daugh­ter and her attempts at secur­ing a divorce had failed. Yet it’s not that there aren’t peo­ple in Iran try­ing to call atten­tion to the plight of such women. Women’s rights activists have been call­ing on the gov­ern­ment to set up shel­ters for bat­tered women for years, but the gov­ern­ment has always refused, “cit­ing Islamic laws that state it is wrong for a woman to leave home with­out her husband’s per­mis­sion.” I con­fess that rea­son­ing leaves me almost speech­less, as it still does all these many years later when I remem­ber the cop who asked me, when I was six­teen and call­ing for help because my mother’s boyfriend had forced her into her bed­room and locked the door behind them because she’d finally asked him to leave and he didn’t want to,“Are you sure your mother’s in their against her will, son?”

I don’t want to erase the dif­fer­ences between what hap­pened to my mother and what hap­pened to Akram Mah­davi, nor do I want to triv­i­al­ize the sig­nif­i­cance of the fact that, in Iran, the rea­son­ing that makes it so dif­fi­cult for bat­tered women, or women like Mah­davi, who was try­ing to pro­tect her daugh­ter from abuse, to find jus­tice is couched in an abso­lutist reli­gious rhetoric – though it’s not as if reli­gion has not been used here in the States to jus­tify treat­ing women, not to men­tion peo­ple of color, as sec­ond class cit­i­zens – but I find right now the sim­i­lar­i­ties more com­pelling than the dif­fer­ences. In each case, the woman’s auton­omy is under­stood to be cir­cum­scribed by the author­ity of the man who pos­sesses her sex­u­ally. In Islam, the hus­band must give her per­mis­sion to leave the sphere of his author­ity (and, there­fore, of his pro­tec­tion) with­out him1; in the case of the cop on the phone, his assump­tion was that I might have mis­taken some kind of sex­ual play, in which my mother was enjoy­ing the force her boyfriend was using to keep her in the room, for a sit­u­a­tion in which the boyfriend was unwill­ing to let my mother go out­side the sphere of his author­ity and in which he might turn – was already turn­ing – vio­lent because she did not obey him. That the author­ity is legal in the case of Islam and, for want of a bet­ter word, cul­tural in the case of my mother and her boyfriend, does not change the fact that the nature of the author­ity, a man’s right to rule his women, is the same.

  1. One of the odd­est expe­ri­ences I’ve had being mar­ried to a Mus­lim woman who occa­sion­ally trav­els to Iran has been the require­ment, imposed by the Iran­ian gov­ern­ment, that I write her a let­ter giv­ing her my offi­cial per­mis­sion to travel with­out me. []

Domestic Violence Has Always Been a Current Running Through My Life

Three weeks ago, as the stu­dents were fil­ing out of the room at the end of one of my classes, a woman stopped in front of my desk and said some­thing along the lines of, “So I want to write poetry, but I don’t know how to start. Can you help me?”

A ques­tion like that is not one you want to give an easy answer to, at least not with­out hear­ing a lit­tle more of what the per­son who asks has to say about them­selves, why they want to write and per­haps even what they want to write about, so I asked her to wait while I packed up my things and we went to find another room. As we sat down, it was clear that my stu­dent was ner­vous about some­thing and I, of course, assumed it was related to her ques­tion about writ­ing poetry. It was, but not in the way I antic­i­pated, and so I am going to skip over most of what we talked about to get to the point. After talk­ing a bit about strate­gies for start­ing to write, I sug­gested to my stu­dent that she might want to check out a local read­ing series run by one of my col­leagues. It’s a won­der­ful, warm, wel­com­ing place for begin­ners to go, both to hear other people’s work and to begin to share their own, but as soon as I sug­gested it, my stu­dents said, “You know, I barely have enough time to work, go to school and go home. I am in a very dif­fi­cult sit­u­a­tion and I know I won’t get the chance to go.”

Some­thing in her tone of voice told me she was not talk­ing about a merely prac­ti­cal dif­fi­culty and so I asked her, “By dif­fi­cult do you mean dan­ger­ous?” She said yes. I don’t want to give any more details, since I don’t want any­one to be able to iden­tify her from what I write here, but suf­fice it to say that she accepted my invi­ta­tion to tell me more about her sit­u­a­tion, and she is in a mar­riage that she needs des­per­ately to get out of. Her hus­band has not phys­i­cally harmed her yet, but she is afraid of him, and while she didn’t say so explic­itly when we talked, I think she believes him capa­ble of killing her if things ever get to that point.

I am doing what I can to help, and if it becomes pos­si­ble, per­haps I will write more about that, but what I have been think­ing about today is how domes­tic vio­lence has always been a cur­rent run­ning through my own life, from the boyfriend who held my mother hostage with a butcher’s cleaver to my mother’s best friend when I was a young teenager, who was found stabbed six­teen times in the chest with a ser­rated knife, most prob­a­bly by her boyfriend; from the woman in whose bed I spent the night – no sex was involved – because she was afraid that if her boyfriend came back he might get vio­lent to the woman who lived down­stairs from me who screamed like she was dying when the cops showed up at her door because I called them on a night when I was home to hear her boyfriend beat­ing the shit out of her. (He heard me telling the story about that night to a friend of mine through the way-too-thin walls of my apart­ment and called back that, now that he knew who had called the cops, he was going to make me pay for it. He never did, but it scared me. He was a very big man.) And then, of course, there was my own too-close-for-comfort-brush with being the one on whom some­one else might have had to call the cops.

I don’t really have much to say about all this tonight in any ana­lyt­i­cal sense; it’s just all been com­ing back to me in waves of feel­ing and it put me in mind to share this poem, “Coitus Inter­rup­tus,” which is from my book called The Silence of Men. There are likely to be all kinds of trig­gers all over the poem, so if you decide to read it, this has been your trig­ger warn­ing. The only other thing I will say about this poem is that, with the excep­tion of a few details which I had to alter in order to make the poem work, each of the inci­dents I tell about in the poem actu­ally hap­pened more or less the way they hap­pen in the poem:

Coitus Inter­rup­tus

1.

Naked at the win­dow, my wife calls me
as if some­one is dying, and some­one
almost is, pinned to the con­crete face down
beneath the fists and feet and knees of three

police­men. I’m still hard from before she
jumped out of bed to answer the ques­tion
I was will­ing not to ask when the siren
stopped on our block, but now I’m here, and I see

the man is Black, and how can I not
bear wit­ness? They’ve cuffed him,
but the uni­forms con­tinue to crowd our street,
and the blue-and-whites keep coming,

as if called to war, as if the lives
in all these dark­ened homes
were truly at stake, and that’s the thing—
who can tell from up here? — maybe

we’re watch­ing our sal­va­tion
with­out know­ing it. Above our heads,
a voice calls out Fuck­ing pigs!
but the ones who didn’t drag the man

into a wait­ing car and drive off
refuse the bait. They talk qui­etly,
gath­ered beneath the street­lamp
in the pale cir­cle of light

the man was beaten in, and then
a word we can­not hear is given
and the cops wave each other back
to their vehi­cles, the flash and sparkle

of their dri­ving off
throw­ing onto the wall of our room
a shadow of the embrace
my wife and I have been cling­ing to.

When I was six­teen, Tommy
brought to my room before he left
the Simon and Gar­funkel tape
I’d put the pre­vi­ous night

back among his things. He placed it
on the book­shelf near the door
he’d slammed shut two days ear­lier
when he was hold­ing a butcher’s cleaver

to my mother’s life. I wanted
to run after him and smash it at his feet;
I wanted to grab him by the scruff of the neck
and crush it in his face, to dan­gle him

over the side of our build­ing with one
ankle in my left hand and the Great­est Hits
in my right and ask him
which I should let drop.

But I didn’t, couldn’t really:
he was much too big,
and I was not a fighter,
and one of my best friends right now

lives with her son in the house
where her hus­band has already hit her
with a cast iron fry­ing pan,
and so there is no rea­son to believe

she is not at this moment cring­ing
bruised and bleed­ing in a cor­ner
of their bed­room, or that she is not,
with her boy and noth­ing else in her arms,

run­ning the way my mother
didn’t have a chance to run,
and there’s noth­ing I can do
but look at the clock — Sunday,

11:11 PM — and remind myself
it’s too late to call, that my calls
have caused trou­ble for her already.
When they pushed Tommy in handcuffs

out the front door, past where my mother sat,
quiet, unmov­ing, and I did not know
from where inside my own rage and ter­ror
to pull the com­fort I should have offered her,

the offi­cer mak­ing sure Tommy
didn’t trip or run winked at me, smil­ing
as if what had hap­pened were sud­denly
a secret between us, and this our signal

that every­thing was okay. I won­dered
if his had been the voice, calm
and deep with male author­ity—Son,
are you sure your mother’s in there

against her will?—that when I called
forced me to find the more-than-yes
I can’t remem­ber the words to
that con­vinced the cops they had to come.

2.

Sopho­more year, walk­ing the road
girdling the cam­pus. Up ahead, a woman’s voice
plead­ing with a man’s shout­ing to stop.
A car door slam­ming, engine revving,

and then wheels dig­ging hard into dri­ve­way dirt
that when I got there was a dust cloud
obscur­ing the blue vehicle’s rear plate.
The woman sprawled on the asphalt,

her black dress spread around her
like an open por­tal her upper body
emerged from. She pulled
the cloth away from her feet,

which were bleed­ing, and I drove
to where her spaghetti strap san­dals
lay torn and twisted beyond repair.
She left them there. Then to her home,

two rooms in a neigh­bor­hood house,
and I helped her onto the bed
that was her only fur­ni­ture, and filled
a warm-water basin to soak her feet,

and he had not hit her, so there was noth­ing
to report, but she said she was afraid
and would I sit with her a while.
We talked about her home in Seoul,

the man her par­ents picked for her
that she ran to Amer­ica to avoid mar­ry­ing,
and here she laughed — first trickle
of spring water down a win­ter mountain—

So instead I take from Egypt! I so stu­pid!
Then: What you think? Can man and woman
sleep same bed with­out sex?
I said yes.
So, please, tonight, you stay here? Maybe he com­ing back.

He fear white Amer­i­can like you. I was not a fighter,
but I stayed, and in the morn­ing when I left,
she said kam­sa­ham­nida—thank you—
and she bowed low, and she did not

ask my name, nor I hers, and though
I some­times looked for her on cam­pus,
I never saw her again. Just like Tommy,
whom I for­got to say before was white.

Just like the Black woman who lived down­stairs
before I got mar­ried, whose cries—Help!
Please! He’s killing me!
—and the dead thud
of him, also Black, throw­ing her

against the wall, and his scream­ing—
Shut up, bitch! Fuck­ing whore!—filled the space
till I was drown­ing. The desk sergeant
didn’t ask if I knew beyond a doubt

that she was being beaten,
but when she opened her front door
to the two men he sent, she shrieked
the way women shriek

in bad hor­ror movies
when they know they’re going to die,
and I almost felt sorry for calling.A few weeks later,

a voice on the phone: You know
what’s going on below you, right?
Please, tape a mes­sage to the door: “Mr. Peters
has been try­ing to reach you.” Noth­ing else.

And what­ever you do, don’t sign it.
For a month all was quiet. Then,
com­ing home early from work
I walked upstairs past peo­ple mov­ing furniture

out of her apart­ment. No one ever
wants to get involved,
right? a thin white man
in shorts and a t-shirt whis­pered bit­ter
behind me. I kept walking

the way Tommy did when he saw me
try­ing to catch his eye: head down,
gaze nailed to the floor, and then he was gone,
and the ques­tions I wanted to ask him

never became words. That tape
was all I had, till one day,
clean­ing house, my mother
held it up:

Do you still want this?

I never play it.

Throw it out then.

So I did.

Fragments of Evolving Manhood: Thinking About Pornography 4

I did not go to pornog­ra­phy because I’d been sex­u­ally abused, but the fact that I’d been abused made the world of pornog­ra­phy one that it felt nat­ural for me to inhabit.

One of the effects that sex­ual abuse often has on those who sur­vive it is make any expres­sion of our own sex­u­al­ity feel as if we are reen­act­ing the pat­tern of the abuse we suf­fered. In me – and I am writ­ing here about the years span­ning my mid-teens and early twen­ties – that feel­ing had less to do with expe­ri­enc­ing sex as a kind of instant replay of my own vic­tim­iza­tion than with the fear that being sex­ual in and of itself made me no dif­fer­ent from the men who had abused me. Yet I was sex­ual. No mat­ter how hard I tried I could not make my sex­ual feel­ings go away, and so my desire for women, my lust and emo­tional spon­tane­ity, became repug­nant to me, defects of char­ac­ter I needed to repair; and I did try to repair them, to remake myself as a man in com­plete con­trol of his feel­ings, sex­ual and oth­er­wise, because only when I had attained that level of con­trol would I be a man inca­pable of vic­tim­iz­ing oth­ers.1

My efforts, of course, failed, and it was in pornog­ra­phy – not con­sciously, not delib­er­ately, but nonethe­less, I think, inevitably – that I found a way to deal with my fail­ure. For the world of pornog­ra­phy, or at least of the main­stream het­ero­sex­ual pornog­ra­phy that was avail­able to me at the time, is in many ways very sim­i­lar to the world into which a sex­ual abuser indoc­tri­nates the per­son he or she abuses; it is a world in which every­thing, every human inter­ac­tion, whether with another human being or an object, is sex­u­al­ized. More than that, this sex­u­al­iza­tion is nor­mal; it is what the peo­ple of that world expect from each other and of them­selves; and so to feel sex­ual in that world, to act on those feel­ings in that world, can­not be defined as abuse. As opposed to my friends, in other words, for whom pornog­ra­phy began as and con­tin­ued be pri­mar­ily a kind of instruc­tion man­ual for how to be sex­ual in the real world, for me, once I’d been abused, pornog­ra­phy became a place where I could clois­ter my sex­u­al­ity, and there­fore my shame, shut­ting it out of the life I lived in the real world as much as I could and cre­at­ing the illu­sion that I had put the shame and the abuse behind me.

Not that I hid my inter­est in pornog­ra­phy. On the con­trary, I spoke about it quite openly, insist­ing that it was pos­si­ble to engage respectably and intel­lec­tu­ally with the topic, even though most of the con­ver­sa­tions I tried to start ended with some­one accus­ing me of cam­ou­flag­ing with the respectabil­ity I was claim­ing my real and more pruri­ent inter­est in the mate­r­ial. They were, of course, cor­rect. As often as I could man­age it, I immersed myself in the world that het­ero­sex­ual pornog­ra­phy offered me: a world of women, semi-clothed or fully naked, open-mouthed and open-legged, wait­ing to be for me what I wanted them to be, and every detail, page after page, frame after frame, right down to whether or not a woman had goose bumps, spoke to me of sex, of the mys­ter­ies con­tained in her body and in mine, and I imag­ined I was glean­ing the truth of it, though not only did that truth always prove always elu­sive, but it had also had very lit­tle to do with the intel­lec­tual pur­suit I pre­tended dur­ing the day that my inter­est in pornog­ra­phy really was.

The pic­ture that changed for­ever the way I looked at pornog­ra­phy was in a mag­a­zine called Puri­tan, in the bot­tom right cor­ner of the right hand page. The man was seated on a chair with his legs splayed out in front of him, his face and upper body hid­den by the woman, who was sit­ting with her feet on his thighs, her legs bent at the knees and spread wide so you could see how deeply she’d taken his penis into her. Her head was tilted slightly for­ward, and her eyes, which were round and moist and oh-so-innocent, were look­ing directly at the cam­era. Her lips were full and pouty. I don’t know why, but what I saw in the first moment I looked at that pic­ture was not the sex kit­ten she was sup­posed to be, but rather a lit­tle girl made to open her legs for the world to see the “slut” she “really” was, and this per­cep­tion touched my own sex­ual shame, and I got sick to my stom­ach, and I started to cry, and I could not bring myself to look at the pic­ture again, even though I kept it in my desk for weeks.

Over time, I came to under­stand that what I thought I saw on that woman’s face was in part a pro­jec­tion of what I saw in myself, and that it might well have had noth­ing to do with what she her­self was feel­ing or with what other peo­ple look­ing at the same pic­ture might have seen. I found I couldn’t look at images of peo­ple hav­ing sex any­more with­out won­der­ing about the degree to which the inte­rior land­scape of the per­form­ers’ expe­ri­ences cor­re­sponded to what I thought I saw in their per­for­mance. This change in per­spec­tive was trans­form­ing. I began to see sex not sim­ply as a series of par­tic­u­lar acts that I per­formed with par­tic­u­lar peo­ple, includ­ing myself, but also as a way of know­ing, not just a method but, lit­er­ally, a path into knowl­edge; and I believed then, though I would not say this now with the same sense of final­ity, that this path would lead me out of the uncer­tainty that look­ing at sex­u­ally explicit images made me feel. What I am cer­tain about, though, is that claim­ing sex as a path into knowl­edge helped me feel in ways that I never had before that I had a right to the phys­i­cal pres­ence I inhab­ited on this planet, pre­cisely the right that the men who abused me had pre­sumed to take away.

  1. For a detailed dis­cus­sion of this dou­ble bind and how it works, see Mike Lew, Vic­tims No Longer: Men Recov­er­ing from Incest and Other Sex­ual Child Abuse (Harper & Row, 1990) 185 – 87. []

Fragments of Evolving Manhood: Do You Like Your Body 2

At eleven, I am the youngest of eight boys lined up along one row of lock­ers in the oth­er­wise empty men’s room at the swim­ming pool to which the day camp we are attend­ing takes us every other day. Nor­mally, I’d be chang­ing with boys my own age, but a mix-up back at the camp grounds landed me on the bus with these guys, who are all twelve and thir­teen. I turn my back to them to hide the erec­tion that has taken hold of my body and which I am hav­ing dif­fi­culty fit­ting into my bathing suit. Despite my best efforts to remain incon­spic­u­ous, how­ever, my move­ments attract their atten­tion and one of them sneaks up behind me and looks over my shoul­der. “Hey,” his voice rings out metal­li­cally, “look at the size of Newman’s boner!”

Like a pack of dogs that has been thrown a sin­gle piece of meat, the group sur­rounds me in a tight cir­cle, while I stand there not mov­ing, body point­ing me into the air above the mid­dle of the room, wish­ing I could van­ish, that it would van­ish, but no mat­ter how much I will it, the damned thing will not go down.

“What are you, a homo!?”

“Other guys’ dicks must turn him on!”

“Wanna suck mine, queer!?”

The taunts con­tinue for what seems like hours, though it is prob­a­bly only a few min­utes, and then the head coun­selor comes in and ush­ers us all out to the pool. I can’t believe he didn’t hear what the other boys were say­ing, but he acts as if he didn’t, barely look­ing at me as he shows me where the boys in my group have spread their towels.

Later that evening, while I’m get­ting ready for bed, I stand naked before the full-length mir­ror inside my door and tuck my penis out of sight between my legs. I’m not try­ing to imag­ine myself as a girl, but I am intrigued by the pos­si­bil­ity of a body that does not have erections.

///

When I was a teenager, I read in Pent­house mag­a­zine a let­ter – I think it was in Xavier Hollander’s “Happy Hooker” col­umn – in which a woman described how she and a friend took revenge on a man who’d tried to rape the friend. The writer of the let­ter arranged to meet the man at a disco, invited him to her apart­ment, and seduced him into being tied, spread-eagled, to her bed. Then the woman’s friend, who’d been wait­ing in another room, came in, and the two women teased the man sex­u­ally until he was beg­ging them for release. In response, the women took out a razor and shav­ing cream, telling him that, if he ejac­u­lated while they rubbed his penis, they would shave all the hair from his body. The let­ter went on to describe in great detail first the man’s plead­ing with them not to do it and then his efforts to keep him­self from com­ing while the women took turns mas­tur­bat­ing him. Finally, of course, he came, and the women shaved him, threat­en­ing to slice off his tes­ti­cles if he didn’t lay still.

Now, of course, I under­stand not only that the let­ter might have been, that it most prob­a­bly was, a com­plete fab­ri­ca­tion, even that it might even have been writ­ten by a man, but also, assum­ing for the sake of argu­ment that the events it relates actu­ally hap­pened, the fact that is was pub­lished in Pent­house means that its sole pur­pose was to feed, to shape and even to cre­ate the desires and fan­tasies of the boys and men like me who read the mag­a­zine. At the time, though, I read the let­ter naively, assum­ing it to be true – why, after all, would some­one pub­lish a let­ter that wasn’t? – and so it was clear to me that it described a rape. The woman who osten­si­bly wrote it didn’t present what she and her friend did to the man as any­thing else — except to make clear that it was moti­vated by revenge — and she never implied that he enjoyed it. Nonethe­less, my sex­ual imag­i­na­tion was drawn to the story. For months, for years after­ward, I fan­ta­sized about women tying me to a bed and cre­at­ing in my flesh an arousal so all-encompassing that I too would be will­ing to beg for release. Yet no mat­ter how hard I tried to imag­ine a con­clu­sion other than the one in the let­ter, I always ended up the vic­tim of some ver­sion of the revenge the writer and her friend took, and what I remem­ber most about this now is how fully this end­ing short-circuited the fan­tasy, and when I say “fully short-circuited,” I mean fully and com­pletely. If I was mas­tur­bat­ing, I found it very hard to con­tinue; if I was sim­ply day­dream­ing, I’d have to stop and think of some­thing else, not because I felt and was try­ing to avoid, or deny, the guilty, shame­ful plea­sure that often accom­pa­nies “for­bid­den fan­tasies,” but rather because I was scared. I sim­ply did not trust the women I imag­ined not to turn into the women described in the let­ter. More than that, though, I iden­ti­fied with their victim’s expe­ri­ence of hav­ing the plea­sures of his body turned against him, and the knowl­edge that I could be shamed just as he had been shamed taught me only one thing: my body was always the poten­tial weapon of my own defeat.

///

We’re sit­ting in a cir­cle in a reme­dial com­po­si­tion class that I’m teach­ing. The stu­dents are read­ing aloud and com­ment­ing on fables they’ve writ­ten over the week­end. The prose is awk­ward and ungram­mat­i­cal, though I am impressed with the imag­i­na­tive effort some of my stu­dents have made. There’s a mod­ern­ized ver­sion of Lit­tle Red Rid­ing Hood, set in an upper class neigh­bor­hood with the most sought-after senior boy in the local high school tak­ing the part of the wolf. There’s also a gender-reversed Sleep­ing Beauty, in which Princess Charm­ing turns out to be the home­less woman who sleeps in the park. I’m about to move on to the next part of the les­son when Wal­ter, who’d announced when we began that he wasn’t going to read what he’d writ­ten, asks whether I’d like to hear his story. Of course I say yes.

Walter’s nar­ra­tive takes place in the future and involves a very pow­er­ful drug dealer whose orga­ni­za­tion has been infil­trated by a top female nar­cotics agent pos­ing as a pros­ti­tute. When the dealer’s lover, who also works for him as a pros­ti­tute, learns that the oper­a­tion has been com­pro­mised, she tells him imme­di­ately. Armed with this infor­ma­tion, the dealer exposes the spy and has her tor­tured slowly and painfully to death. To express his grat­i­tude, he takes his lover to bed, giv­ing her, in Walter’s words, “the lit­eral fuck of her life, pound­ing away until she was no longer breath­ing.” The story ends with a descrip­tion of the lav­ish funeral the dealer gives her.

When Wal­ter fin­ishes read­ing, he looks around the cir­cle with a sar­cas­tic and self-satisfied grin. The rest of the class is silent, no one except me will­ing to meet his eyes, and I’m hop­ing that one of his peers will be the first to speak, con­demn­ing what he’s writ­ten not in the voice of author­ity — which my voice would inevitably be — but in the voice of his own com­mu­nity. A minute passes before I real­ize that his class­mates don’t intend to respond, and so I call on a few stu­dents by name, male and female, to see if I can draw them out. The men all say that the story is “sick,” while the women tell me they think it’s not even worth respond­ing to. Yet it has to be responded to, and so I ask Wal­ter if he really believes that fuck­ing a woman to death could be an expres­sion of gratitude.

“Of course,” he says, “For the woman it’s the ulti­mate ful­fill­ment, and for the man it’s the ulti­mate proof.”

“Of what?”

“Of man­hood,” he responds, “Women would take tick­ets and stand in line to be with a man pow­er­ful enough to fuck them like that.” He says these words with a con­vic­tion I at first can’t think how to argue with, but then I won­der aloud if he would include his girl­friend or his future wife in that line of women.

“I’m not talk­ing,” he says, “about doing this to some­one I love. I’m talk­ing about the pieces of trash you can pick up at the local bar, the sluts who give it away, the hook­ers who do it for money, women who are ask­ing for it.”

“Why,” I ask, “do they deserve to be murdered?”

“They’re whores,” he responds, “No one cares about them.”

I take a dif­fer­ent tack, ask­ing him if he’s ever killed any­thing other than an insect. When he says no, I ask him if he real­izes that he’s talk­ing about using his own body, his penis specif­i­cally, as a mur­der weapon and that the mur­der he says he would like to com­mit is not sim­ply one in which his vic­tim dies in his arms, but is also one in which he would feel against his own flesh the inter­nal process of her dying.

“Yes, I do,” he says.

Try­ing again, I go back to what he said about not want­ing to fuck to death a woman he loves and ask if he makes a dis­tinc­tion between the sex he would have for plea­sure with that woman and the power he says he would like to expe­ri­ence of using sex to kill. Wal­ter looks at me with a mix­ture of pity and con­tempt. “Power,” he says, “is pleasure.”

Class ends. As I’m putting my papers in my brief­case, Wal­ter steps up to my desk. “Now that every­one else is gone,” he says, his voice full of con­spir­a­to­r­ial cama­raderie, “be hon­est. Wouldn’t it feel great to take some slut to a hotel and then meet your bud­dies later and tell them you’d killed her with your dick?”

“No,” is all I can think to say.

“Sure, maybe now that you’re older and you can’t get it up like you used to – I was in my thir­ties – but when you were younger, when you were an under­grad­u­ate, wasn’t fuck­ing some­thing you did so you could share it with your bud­dies, and impress them, and wouldn’t they have wor­shipped you if you told them you’d fucked some­one to death?”

I decide that mono­syl­labic answers are the best way to deal with this line of ques­tion­ing. “No,” I tell him again.

Wal­ter waits a few sec­onds for me to say more. When I don’t, he mut­ters some­thing under his breath of which I think I hear the words pathetic and excuse. Then he walks out, and it’s the last I see or hear of him until I get my final ros­ter with a W for with­drawal next to his name. Of course there are many rea­sons why he might have had to with­draw from the class, but it’s hard for me not to think he did so because I wasn’t “man enough” to be his teacher.

///

In an episode of the long-and-deservedly-defunct TV series She-Wolf Of Lon­don, a very old man is brought into the hos­pi­tal dying of unknown causes. The doc­tor on duty believes the old man is either senile or insane because he keeps insist­ing he is actu­ally twenty-seven years old and that he was turned into an old man by a woman. As the doc­tor leaves, he orders a nurse to give the old man a seda­tive. Once the nurse and the old man are alone, how­ever, she unzips her uni­form to reveal black-lace lin­gerie, and the old man rec­og­nizes her as the woman who has aged him — one of what the view­ers will later learn is a group of suc­cubae who have opened an escort ser­vice in England’s cap­i­tal city. As the old man looks on in help­less ter­ror, the suc­cubus begins to climb into the hos­pi­tal bed where he is lay­ing. As she does so, she reminds him in the voice of a preda­tor enjoy­ing the pow­er­less­ness of its prey that all he has to do is not want her and he will be able to live. All he has to do, in other words, is not have an erec­tion and she will not be able to fuck him to death.

Anger Needs a Voice

Unfor­tu­nately, I have not had the time to stay as cur­rent as I would like on the Pope’s alleged com­plic­ity, when he was a car­di­nal, in the Church’s cov­er­ing up and pos­si­bly enabling of the sex­ual abuse of boys by priests in Ger­many and the United States, and so I have not been able to write about it in an informed way. Nei­ther the sex­ual abuse of chil­dren nor its being swept under the rug such that per­pe­tra­tors are able to con­tinue abus­ing chil­dren is unique to the Catholic Church, of course, but, as a sur­vivor of such abuse myself, it is impos­si­ble for me not to iden­tify with the anger con­tained in this car­toon, which I found on Cagle Blogs.

ETA April 2, 2010: As Robert pointed out to me on Alas, the image of the priest on the right con­forms to neg­a­tive stereo­types of both priests and gay men and by post­ing this image with­out com­ment­ing on that fact I implic­itly endorsed that stereo­type. So let me say here that while I con­tinue to iden­tify with the anger in this car­toon, I think it is unfor­tu­nate that the anger found expres­sion in such a stereo­typ­i­cal image. Clearly the same point could have been made with a dif­fer­ent image.

Translating Classical Persian Poetry: Farid al-Din Attar’s “Ilahi-Nama”

One of eight major works that can reli­ably be ascribed to Attar, Ilahi-Nama (Book of God or, some­times, Divine Book) has, accord­ing to Ency­clo­pe­dia Iran­ica, been trans­lated once into Eng­lish, by John A. Boyle in 1976, and once into French, by F. Rouhani in 1961. Four of Attar’s eight works—Ilahi-Nama is part of this sub­set — are mys­ti­cal nar­ra­tives, each one deal­ing with a dif­fer­ent aspect of Sufi thought and expe­ri­ence. Ilahi-Nama’s sub­ject is zuhd, or asceti­cism, which Sufis under­stand to mean a dis­ci­plined stance of detach­ment and indif­fer­ence towards one’s desires so that one will not be ruled by them. This focus on the inte­rior world of human emo­tion dif­fer­en­ti­ates Ilahi-Nama from the other of Attar’s poems with which it is often com­pared, Man­teq al-tayr (Con­fer­ence of the Birds), his best known work in Eng­lish. The two poems are sim­i­lar in form (they are each frame sto­ries) and mes­sage (the key to enlight­en­ment exists within each human being, not in the exter­nal world), but the fram­ing nar­ra­tive of Man­teq al-tayr, an alle­gory about a group of birds in search of a king, is essen­tially a cri­tique of people’s need to find a mas­ter who will lead them on the path to true under­stand­ing. Ilahi-Nama, on the other hand, is about learn­ing to mas­ter oneself.

The fram­ing nar­ra­tive of Ilahi-Nama is about a caliph who asks his six sons what they desire most. The first son says he wants the daugh­ter of the king of the peris (faeries); the sec­ond wants to learn the art of magic; the third son desires Jamshid’s cup because it will reveal to him the secrets of the world; the fourth seeks the water of life; the fifth son cov­ets the ring Solomon used to con­trol demons; and the sixth son wants to mas­ter alchemy. As each son gives his answer, the father tells sto­ries to illus­trate, first, how shal­low and mate­ri­al­is­tic the son is for want­ing what he wants and, sec­ond, how the son should under­stand his desire so he can use it on the path to enlight­en­ment. None of the sons, how­ever, accept their father’s lessons at face value, argu­ing that he has mis­un­der­stood their desires and that the lessons he wants them to learn, there­fore, are mis­guided. When the father tells his first son what has come to be known as “The Tale of Mar­juma,” for exam­ple — about a beau­ti­ful and right­eous woman who, after her hus­band leaves on pil­grim­age to Mecca, must fend off a series of men who are so over­come with lust when they glimpse her beauty that they will stop at noth­ing to have her — the son accuses his father of want­ing to elim­i­nate sex. “God for­bid[!]” the father replies, explain­ing that “The Tale of Mar­juma” illus­trates how sex, prop­erly com­pre­hended and entered into, is a first step on the path to enlightenment:

But when your desire achieves apoth­e­o­sis,
sex gives birth to a love with­out lim­its;
and when this love is pushed by pas­sion to the edge
of its strength, spir­i­tual love emerges; and when
spir­i­tual love can grow no fur­ther, your soul
will van­ish into the Beloved’s end­less­ness. (My translation)

Given that the sur­face of the nar­ra­tive in “The Tale of Mar­juma” feels more like a Perils-of-Pauline-type story in which the depraved and debauched men get their come­up­pance than one about the spir­i­tual nature of sex­u­al­ity, the son’s mis­read­ing of the tale is an easy one to fall into. Such a read­ing, how­ever, fails to account for, among other things, the fact that not all the men who try to pos­sess the woman give in to their desires with­out a strug­gle. They are, in other words, nei­ther evil nor merely slaves to their desires; they are human and flawed and, more to the point, they are, in the end, able and will­ing to repent. Indeed, they must repent, for God has pun­ished them with a paral­y­sis from which — in an irony that is at the core of the story’s mean­ing — they can be healed only by con­fess­ing to the woman every­thing they did to her. Con­tinue read­ing