Fragments of Evolving Manhood: The “Cunt Poem” Challenge

I have not posted a Frag­ments of Evolv­ing Man­hood piece on a long while, mostly because my atten­tion has been focused else­where, but I have been work­ing these past cou­ple of weeks on an essay that is pretty impor­tant to me and since it fits in the “Frag­ments” series, I thought I’d share some of it. I’d love to be able to call the essay “The ‘Cunt Poem’ Chal­lenge,” and I will prob­a­bly send it out with that title, but I am bet­ting not a few edi­tors will have a hard time with it. In any event, here is the excerpt. Please be aware as you read that the first para­graph is the intro­duc­tion, which I think you need for con­text, while the sec­ond and third para­graphs are from later on in the essay.

The leader of my first grad­u­ate poetry work­shop — this was 1985 — was telling us about a chal­lenge she’d issued to the men in the group of poets she hung out with when she was younger. “None of you,” she said she told them, “will ever write a suc­cess­ful ‘cunt poem,’ because, when it comes to cunts, men only under­stand clichés.” We all laughed, the three of us who were men per­haps a lit­tle uncom­fort­ably, and then she informed us that a poem her chal­lenge had inspired was in the anthol­ogy she’d assigned as our text. I read that poem four times when I got home that night, find­ing it harder to believe with each read­ing that any­one could have thought it deserved pub­li­ca­tion. Not only did it rely on pre­cisely the kinds of clichés I under­stood my teacher to have been talk­ing about, end­ing, for exam­ple, by call­ing women’s gen­i­tals, with­out irony, “the gates of par­adise;” but the entire poem was built on the biggest cliché of all, treat­ing The Vagina it dis­cussed — because I still can­not help but think of the word as cap­i­tal­ized and in ital­ics, even though it never appears in the poem — as noth­ing more than an object of the poet’s con­tem­pla­tion, like the Gre­cian urn had been for Keats, as if all the vagi­nas The Vagina rep­re­sented were not in real­ity attached to the liv­ing, breath­ing bod­ies of actual women.

///

The first thing I did was trash every poem I’d writ­ten to that point. Then, once I’d let go of the bag­gage all that old work rep­re­sented, the poems that became my first book, The Silence of Men (CavanKerry Press 2006), began to take shape. At last, I felt like I’d found a lan­guage in which I could speak about my body as my own, in which my desires and my fears, my vul­ner­a­bil­i­ties and regrets, my joys and my fail­ures, were mine and no one else’s to give mean­ing to. Com­mit­ting to that lan­guage meant com­mit­ting to a rad­i­cal hon­esty about who I was, both as a sur­vivor of child sex­ual abuse and as a man; it meant reject­ing utterly the rhetoric of invis­i­bil­ity with which the man who forced his penis into my mouth had so effec­tively and for so many years hijacked what I had to say.

That kind of hon­esty is pre­cisely what is lack­ing in the clichés my teacher defined as the lim­its of the male imag­i­na­tion when it comes to writ­ing about women’s gen­i­tals. Take, for exam­ple, the cliché that ends the “cunt poem” I spoke about at the begin­ning of this essay, “the gates of par­adise.” The dis­hon­esty in this metaphor lies pri­mar­ily in the way it objec­ti­fies women’s bod­ies, describ­ing not women’s expe­ri­ence of being embod­ied, and not even men’s expe­ri­ence of women’s bod­ies as bod­ies inhab­ited by women, but rather the par­tic­u­lar expe­ri­ence men have of our own bod­ies when we have sex with women. It praises women’s gen­i­tals, in other words, not for being what they are, but for how men can use them, and so, on a cul­tural level, ren­ders women as invis­i­ble and voice­less as I was ren­dered by the men who used me. To meet my teacher’s chal­lenge, then, to be a male poet who writes a suc­cess­ful “cunt poem,” is not sim­ply to find a non-cliché way of call­ing women’s gen­i­tals “the gates of par­adise.” Rather, it is to dis­cover lan­guage that will make vis­i­ble the women whose gen­i­tals they are, unwrap­ping from within a male per­spec­tive the lay­ers of mis­con­cep­tion and mis­rep­re­sen­ta­tion in which they are bound by the sex­ual objec­ti­fi­ca­tion of women that is so cen­tral to our cul­ture. It is, in other words, a pro­foundly polit­i­cal endeavor, one that requires a man not only to refuse com­plic­ity in the inher­ent vio­la­tion that sex­u­ally objec­ti­fy­ing women is, but also to artic­u­late a way of being a man who sees women as sex­ual beings that does jus­tice to who they are as human beings.

Compulsory Heterosexuality in Action

It’s been a long time since I’ve read Adri­enne Rich’s essay, Com­pul­sory Het­ero­sex­u­al­ity and Les­bian Exis­tence, but I’ve been think­ing about it a lot lately, mostly because I’ve been talk­ing to the stu­dent in my class from South Asia whose par­ents are try­ing des­per­ately to marry her off. She came to my office yes­ter­day and I ended up talk­ing to her for more than an hour, miss­ing the class I was sup­posed to be teach­ing, because she started using expres­sions like maybe I should just end it all when talk­ing about her anger and frus­tra­tion and rage at feel­ing so utterly help­less in her sit­u­a­tion. When I asked her what she meant, she said she was think­ing of just sur­ren­der­ing to her par­ents and doing what they want her to do, that maybe mar­riage – any mar­riage, to any man – was really the only way she would ever get out from under her par­ents’, but mostly her father’s, rule. Still, I thought it bet­ter to keep her talk­ing than to leave her to go teach my class.

I don’t want to reveal too many details of her life, for obvi­ous rea­sons, but I learned a lot more about her in this con­ver­sa­tion than I had in the brief dis­cus­sions we’d had before. She is the youngest child in her fam­ily and so find­ing a suit­able hus­band is an impor­tant goal for her par­ents. Once they do so, they will have ful­filled one of their pri­mary oblig­a­tions as par­ents to their daugh­ters and, in fact, my stu­dent is not entirely opposed to the idea of mar­ry­ing a man her par­ents find for her. She just wants him to be some­one she feels com­pat­i­ble with, some­one in whom she can find some­thing that attracts her; but the men they bring for her to meet, while they are well estab­lished and could take good care of her, in the way that “good care” is defined in her cul­ture, they have all been, she says, not only bor­ing, but really, really (to her taste) ugly. What she wants is the free­dom to choose her own hus­band. She’s pretty clear that her first choice would be a man from the same cul­ture and reli­gion – though she’s not opposed to mar­ry­ing out­side the first group – but she wants him to have at least a lit­tle bit of the Amer­i­can­ized iden­tity that she has. (Even there, though, her expe­ri­ence has not been good. She met a guy whom she thought fit the bill, but as soon as the started going out, he started want­ing to check her Black­berry to see whom she was call­ing and who was call­ing her.)

Adding to the agony of her sit­u­a­tion is how iso­lated she feels. I am the only per­son, accord­ing to her, to whom she has told her entire story – includ­ing the mar­ried boss she used to respect and who has recently started mak­ing passes at her – and she is sur­prised at her­self that she has done so. She doesn’t have a whole lot of trust in Amer­i­cans’ abil­ity to com­pre­hend much less empathize with her sit­u­a­tion, hav­ing been burned a cou­ple of times when she tried to talk to her friends, none of whom were able to wrap their heads around the cul­tural con­text in which she lives, even though she is liv­ing here in the States, and some of whom actu­ally blamed her for not leav­ing, as if leav­ing one’s fam­ily, espe­cially a fam­ily that might dis­own you for doing so, would ever be a sim­ple thing. On top of that is the fact that telling any­one about her family’s pri­vate life vio­lates a very strong cul­tural taboo that inter­prets such rev­e­la­tion as one of the worst kinds of dis­loy­alty both because it sul­lies the family’s honor and rep­u­ta­tion in the com­mu­nity and exposes the fam­ily to what­ever use its ene­mies (in a social, not a mil­i­tary sense) might make of the information.

One of the rea­sons she trusts me is that I know some­thing about Islam and about the kind of cul­ture she comes from. (My wife’s cul­ture is sim­i­lar.) And so she is not wor­ried that I will think she is weird or weak or “bring­ing it all on herself” – each of which is a reac­tion she has got­ten from other “out­siders” she has tried to tell – and she rec­og­nizes that I respect her desire to find a solu­tion that some­how har­mo­nizes with her par­ents’ (and community’s) reli­gious and cul­tural expec­ta­tions, while allow­ing her the free­dom she wants. (Whether or not that is pos­si­ble, of course, is a whole other ques­tion.) And yet, of course, what she needs to do is talk to other peo­ple, to know that I not unique in this respect; and espe­cially what she needs is to find a com­mu­nity of women from whom she can draw strength, who will help her to feel less alone in a way that I sim­ply can­not do, because of both my gen­der and my age. (I am, after all, old enough to be her father.) So I have encour­aged her, and I will encour­age her again, to reg­is­ter for a women’s stud­ies course; I have given her con­tact infor­ma­tion for South Asian women’s orga­ni­za­tions (and I know she has called at least one of them); I have told her about the stu­dent women’s group on cam­pus; and I have, of course, told her she is wel­come to keep com­ing to talk to me, but there really isn’t much else that I can (or should) do.

One of the themes she kept weav­ing through our con­ver­sa­tion was that she was think­ing of run­ning away, but of doing so in a man­ner that would leave her par­ents think­ing she was dead. This way, they would be able to mourn her and move on and not have to live with the con­stant worry for they would feel and the shame of hav­ing had a daugh­ter they could not con­trol. It didn’t mat­ter how many times I gen­tly sug­gested that there might be other ways of leav­ing that would at least leave open an avenue of return or a chan­nel of com­mu­ni­ca­tion – that other women in her sit­u­a­tion have done it – she kept com­ing back to the idea that it was bet­ter for her par­ents to think she was dead than to have live with the knowl­edge and the shame that she was off some­where, not prop­erly mar­ried, liv­ing who knew what kind of deca­dent and depraved Amer­i­can life and so com­pletely lost to them even if she were to show up right then on their doorstep.

It could not, I would not, argue with her any­more. I don’t know her par­ents and it’s not my place – and, any­way, I am not qual­i­fied – to give her advice. All I could think when she left, though, was that I had just wit­nessed a prime exam­ple of com­pul­sory het­ero­sex­u­al­ity at work, and it really, really, really sucked.

Joe Paterno, Jerry Sandusky, Foreskin Man, Vulva Girl and the Two-Thirds of My Freshman Composition Class Who Are Failing Right Now

You know that feel­ing when there is so much going on, so much you have to do, so many dif­fer­ent threads that you need to keep weav­ing together, or balls in the air that you can’t let drop, or spin­ning plates that you have to keep spin­ning, that you can’t make room in your head for a sin­gle, small, even the small­est, coher­ent thought to set­tle? Well, that’s been me these past cou­ple of weeks. I’ve wanted to write about Joe Paterno and Jerry San­dusky and that whole infu­ri­at­ingly shame­ful débâ­cle, but I haven’t been able to feel any­thing other than enraged, haven’t been able to artic­u­late a response other than want­ing to take the world by the scruff of the neck and rub its nose in the rape San­dusky com­mit­ted, that Paterno and so many, all too many, oth­ers con­spired to cover up. And it doesn’t mat­ter whether the cover-up was by com­mis­sion or omis­sion; it’s still a fuck­ing cover-up; and it is part and par­cel of the much larger cover-up that con­tin­ues to obscure the scope and the con­se­quences of the sex­ual abuse of boys that takes place very day all over the world.

I have wanted to write about that, and I have wanted to write yet one more time about Fore­skin Man, which I have posted on before, because I am wide-eyed incred­u­lous at the fact that Matthew Hess was unable to come up with a more imag­i­na­tive female coun­ter­part for Fore­skin Man – because all Super­men need their Super­girls, right? – than Vulva Girl, whose pic­ture I just have to show you:

And here is how Hess describes her:

With the Siri Amulet as he energy source, Vulva Girl har­nesses the super­nat­ural pow­ers of flight and psy­choki­ne­sis to bat­tle female gen­i­tal mutilation.

As she soars across the jun­gles of Africa, girls cel­e­brate her vic­to­ries over the blood­thirsty cir­cum­cis­ers who prey on their frag­ile inno­cence. After cen­turies of suf­fer­ing, their intac­tivist super­heroine has finally arrived.

As quoted in “Fore­skin Man, Meet Vulva Girl,” by Jonah Lowen­feld on Jew​ishJour​nal​ism​.com, Hess states that his goal in intro­duc­ing Vulva Girl is to equate

the surg­eries per­formed on boys and girls… I think every­one has met at least one per­son who believes that cir­cum­cis­ing girls should be a crime, but cir­cum­cis­ing boys is okay[.] The idea behind Fore­skin Man #3 is to expose that dou­ble stan­dard and help per­suade read­ers that male and female cir­cum­ci­sion are really two sides of the same coin.

That state­ment, of course, is prob­lem­atic on its face and it com­pletely obscures all kinds of prob­lems inher­ent in the char­ac­ter of Vulva Girl, start­ing with the fact that she is cer­tainly not a girl, and it doesn’t mat­ter to me that call­ing her Vulva Girl is in the long tra­di­tion of Super­girl, Bat­girl, Won­der­girl or what­ever. The names Fore­skin Man and Vulva Girl, just placed side by side like that because they work as a team, reca­pit­u­lates a whole string of patri­ar­chal, sex­ist notions that do more harm than good, it seems to me, even if they are being deployed in the inter­ests of end­ing female gen­i­tal muti­la­tion and rou­tine infant penile cir­cum­ci­sion. Not to men­tion the racism implicit in how she is described: the jun­gles of Africa? blood­thirsty cir­cum­cis­ers? But even that whole dis­cus­sion, and it is a dis­cus­sion worth hav­ing, has been crowded out of my head, leav­ing just enough room to tell you about, first, the trailer for Fore­skin Man #3, which begins with the words, “The hate us because we are blond” and needs, I think, no other comment:

And, sec­ond, the Fore­skin Man Song, the lyrics of which, I am afraid, speak sim­i­larly for themselves:

Mmmm ooohhhh

While you’re out sav­ing boys from the knife
I can’t help feel­ing lonely in my life
I know it’s a call­ing that must be answered
They’re not the only ones who need to be pampered

I get relief know­ing you put cut­ters away
But a girl still needs time for fore­play
When the doc and mohel are behind bars
Let me help you for­get about those scars

Fore­skin Man, I need your lovin’ tonight
It’s the only thing that makes me feel right
Fore­skin Man, I want that slip and slide
Won’t you please come glide inside?

Fore­skin Man, I miss your gen­tle caress
My body cries for you, I do con­fess
Fore­skin Man, visit my bal­cony
Being gone this long is a felony

I’ll cheer for you on tonight’s news
When they talk about your lat­est res­cues
And while my heart aches for a ren­dezvous
I trust you’ll return when my time is due

These lyrics truly left me speech­less, and I know this is a ter­ri­ble segue, but that speech­less­ness felt to me not so dif­fer­ent from the speech­less­ness I expe­ri­enced grad­ing papers ear­lier today. I am not going to quote for you from my stu­dents’ work, but suf­fice it to say that a lot of it did not reach the cal­iber of this writ­ing; and so I am left feel­ing utterly depressed. I just checked my grade book and fully 2/3 of one of my fresh­man com­po­si­tion classes is fail­ing, most of them sim­ply because they have elected not to hand in work that was due. It is, of course, entirely pos­si­ble that they would be fail­ing even if they had handed in that work, but I have no way of know­ing that. What’s even more depress­ing is that they have all received a warn­ing email from me and not one of them has both­ered to come talk to me. And so tomor­row I will not be teach­ing. I will be telling the stu­dents who are not fail­ing that they have the day off so that I can speak one by one with the stu­dents who are fail­ing. I am not look­ing for­ward to those dis­cus­sions.

“Why I Am A Feminist Man” Published by The Scavenger

I have been away from any really sub­stan­tive blog­ging, or work on my other writ­ing projects, since my grand­mother died because I’ve been busy catch­ing up on every­thing that accu­mu­lated on my desk, work-related and oth­er­wise, while I was deal­ing with her death. I had hoped to start doing some writ­ing this past week­end, but we found out on Fri­day that the admin­is­tra­tion at the col­lege where I teach fired all 66 full-time fac­ulty on tem­po­rary lines, which is the equiv­a­lent of almost 10% of full-timers. Nine of those lines have since been restored, but, as you can imag­ine, the news was demor­al­iz­ing in the extreme, and so it will take me till the end of this week – tomor­row, actu­ally – to fin­ish with my grad­ing and all, and I will be able to get back to my own writ­ing next week. Mean­while, I am excited by the fact that the Aus­tralian online pub­li­ca­tion The Scav­enger has cho­sen to repub­lish my essay Why I Am a Fem­i­nist Man, which orig­i­nally came out on The Take­back.

Why I Love My Straight Boyfriend « Thought Catalog

From Why I Love My Straight Boyfriend « Thought Cat­a­log:

So what exactly does a con­tem­po­rary rela­tion­ship between a gay man and a straight man look like? I don’t know. This is a love affair and it looks like this. Every day we email and text back and forth about who we’re sleep­ing with, how we’re sleep­ing with them, and if we should con­tinue to do so (in his case it’s just one girl in Paris who he’s in love with). We email poems to one another (this is less gay than it sounds since we’re both poets, which is more gay than it sounds), we have event nights, non-event nights, and date nights where we get together for really expen­sive drinks we can’t afford and remix Chrissie Hynde with Camus and (oh my god) our feelings.

It’s really worth read­ing the whole thing.

To Be Seen Is To Be Known and We All Want To Be Known (NSFW)

Con­sider your­self warned: the image below the fold is def­i­nitely not safe for work. I found it on Library Vixen’s tum­blr, who must’ve found it on Art​Facts​.net. The paint­ing is called, sim­ply, “Penis;” the artist is named Ellen Alt­fest, and I think it is breath­tak­ingly beautiful.

When I was in my late teens and early twen­ties, and I saw in hard­core pornog­ra­phy a world where I could be safe sex­u­ally, one thing that con­sis­tently frus­trated me was the mono­lithic way in which the male body, espe­cially the penis, was por­trayed. I wanted to learn from porn, to find myself, under­stand myself in the images I was con­sum­ing, and the penis I saw on the screen or in the pages of the mag­a­zines I read – always hard, always pen­e­trat­ing or being stroked or sucked – rep­re­sented such a nar­row slice of how I expe­ri­enced my own body that I would find myself fill­ing in what I saw as the blanks by remem­ber­ing what it felt like for my penis to get hard. And I would won­der as well how a woman expe­ri­enced that process, because how the women I wanted to have sex with saw me was as impor­tant to me as what I hoped they would allow me to see of them­selves. Images such as this one let me see how I am seen, and it makes me feel good to know that some­one would take the time to look at me so closely, to know me in such inti­mate detail.

One last thought: Thirty years ago, when I was a camp coun­selor, I had a con­ver­sa­tion with one of my campers – he was four­teen or fif­teen years old – in which he said, “I under­stand entirely why boys like Play­boy. Women’s bod­ies, after all, are beau­ti­ful. I can­not under­stand, though, why any girl or woman would want to look at Play­girl. Men’s bod­ies are just so awk­ward and ugly.” I don’t remem­ber what I said in response, but I do remem­ber the shock of recog­ni­tion as I real­ized that, with­out ever hav­ing thought about it con­sciously, I agreed with him. I didn’t want to agree with him, and I don’t any­more, but I did at the time, which makes me sad. Per­haps if more images of the male body such as this one had been avail­able to us, we might not have seen our­selves in such a neg­a­tive light.

Fragments of Evolving Manhood: Why I Am a Feminist Man

The first time the old man who lived in the apart­ment at the top of the stair­case said hello to me, he stopped for a moment as we passed in the court­yard and smiled as if he’d known me my whole life. The sec­ond time, he did the same thing. By the third or fourth time, a rit­ual of greet­ing had grown between us. When­ever we saw each other, he would smile and say hello first; I would smile, say the same thing back, and then, for a long silent moment, he would fix me with his gaze while I stood there, too hap­pily embar­rassed to move, wish­ing when he walked away that I’d done some­thing, any­thing, to pro­long our conversation.

I think of him as “the old man” because of how young I was when I met him — I was thir­teen — but he was prob­a­bly not much older than the forty-nine-years-old I am now, if that old, and so he was the per­fect age for me to see in him a pos­si­ble sur­ro­gate father. My par­ents had sep­a­rated when I was three; my step­fa­ther had recently left us; and I was des­per­ate for some kind of pater­nal atten­tion and approval. So I was thrilled when the old man one day in late sum­mer did not keep walk­ing after our usual exchange, ask­ing me instead, “When am I going to see you?”

I fig­ured he was lonely, like Mrs. Schecht­man had been when she lived in the apart­ment next to his, and the thought of vis­it­ing with him like I used to visit with her made me happy. “Soon!” I answered.

Not too long after­wards, I was on my way out of our build­ing to meet my friends. The old man hap­pened to be walk­ing down the stair­case lead­ing from his apart­ment to the front door, which we reached at the same time. As I went to turn the knob, he held the door shut with his left fore­arm, maneu­ver­ing me with his right till I stood face first in the cor­ner near the mail­boxes where the door frame met the wall. Cov­er­ing my body with his own, he ran his hands beneath my shirt and up the legs of my shorts; he groped my chest and belly, squeezed my butt, cupped my crotch, and he kept whis­per­ing hoarsely into my ear, over and over again, “When am I going to see you?”

I had no words for what he was doing, no train­ing such as young chil­dren get now in how to scream no! to scare off an attacker. All I could do was stand there till he was fin­ished; and when he was fin­ished, I ran. I don’t remem­ber how far or how long or in which direc­tion, but I ran as if I could leave my skin behind, as if run­ning would turn me into another per­son. When I stopped run­ning, in the small park across the street from the Lutheran Church, I sat a long time with the knowl­edge that my run­ning had undone noth­ing, that my body was still the body he’d touched.

Even if I’d wanted to tell some­one — and I didn’t — I was sure no one would believe me, so I pre­tended noth­ing had hap­pened. When the old man passed me the next day and said hello, I said hello back the way I always did, forc­ing myself not to see the ironic twist he added to his smile. After a cou­ple of more times, our hel­los began to feel nor­mal again, and I told myself that maybe it hadn’t hap­pened. Maybe he was just a lonely old man who liked to say hello, and as long as he stayed on his side of that hello, I felt — or, to be more accu­rate, I con­vinced myself that I was — safe.

Some weeks later, as I sat with my friends in front of our build­ing, the old man came home from food shop­ping and asked me to help him upstairs with the bags in his shop­ping cart. I wanted to say no, but I couldn’t. To do so would almost cer­tainly have raised ques­tions for my friends about why I was being so rude, and the last thing I wanted to do was explain myself to them. So I took the bag he pointed to and fol­lowed him up to his apart­ment, where he opened the door and motioned me in ahead of him. The bag was heavy, so I stepped inside, think­ing I’d leave it by the door and get out as quickly as I could, but he was too fast for me. As soon as the door shut behind him, he pushed the shop­ping cart to the side, took the bag from my arms and dropped it to the floor. The cans at the bot­tom landed with a crash that shook the whole apart­ment. Snaking his arms around my waist, he undid my belt and unzipped my pants, push­ing them down so they fell around my ankles. All I could do was stand there, frozen to the spot where my feet had stopped mov­ing. He took me by the hand and led me to the couch against the wall. He sat down. Look­ing up at me with a wide smile — I have the dis­tinct mem­ory that he’d taken out his two front teeth — his eyes, at what I imag­ine must have been the fear in mine, grew ten­der. “You’ve never had a blowjob before, have you?” When I shook my head no, his voice filled with con­cern. “But don’t you want me to love you?”

In the silence with which I responded, he took my penis in his hands — I remem­ber think­ing his fin­gers were like a cage — and he told me how good it was, how beau­ti­ful and big, and then his own pants were down, and I was sit­ting on the couch, and his penis, large and pur­ple, hung in front of my face. His voice came from some­where above me, urg­ing me to play with it, at least to touch it, and I don’t remem­ber if I did — no, at this point, my mem­ory goes white, like the blank space in a video of which a por­tion has been erased, though I can still feel his hands on the back of my head. Then I see myself walk­ing to the door, unlock­ing it, clos­ing it behind me, and some­how I am next in my bed, curled in the fetal posi­tion, where I stay until my mother calls me for dinner.

The next day, the old man saw me stand­ing by myself in front of our build­ing. He didn’t come close, just stood some dis­tance away and pleaded with me to go upstairs with him again. This time, he promised, would be dif­fer­ent. He would move more slowly, be more gen­tle. I said no, ignor­ing his fur­ther pleas until he left me alone, which he did for the rest of the time he lived in our build­ing. I still nod­ded in recog­ni­tion if I was with some­one when he saw me — I did not want any­one won­der­ing why I didn’t — but oth­er­wise I did my best to ignore him, and he seemed con­tent to ignore me as well. Even­tu­ally, he moved away, and what he’d done to me receded even fur­ther into the silence I’d wrapped it in, and I pulled that silence around me like a pro­tec­tive cloak. No one else ever had to know.

The fab­ric of my silence started to fray when, at nine­teen years old, I read Adri­enne Rich’s On Lies, Secrets and Silence. At the time, I was inter­ested in Rich as a poet; I knew noth­ing about her as a fem­i­nist. Indeed, fem­i­nism itself was barely on my radar as some­thing with a sub­stan­tive rel­e­vance to my life, and so I was sur­prised to find myself enthralled and ener­gized by the polit­i­cal and explic­itly woman-centered con­tent of what I was read­ing. Then I came to this pas­sage from “Cary­atid: Two Columns:”

[T]aught to view our bod­ies as our total­ity, our gen­i­tals as our chief source of fas­ci­na­tion and value, many women have become dis­so­ci­ated from their own bodies…viewing them­selves as objects to be pos­sessed by men rather than as the sub­jects of an existence.

As soon as I read those words, a small voice in my head began to speak. “But what about me?” it wanted to know. “What about what hap­pened to me?” I sought out other fem­i­nist texts and read vora­ciously, dis­cov­er­ing in the fem­i­nist analy­sis of men’s sex­ual vio­lence against women a vocab­u­lary for nam­ing what the old man in my build­ing had done to me as the vio­la­tion it was. More impor­tantly, though, being able to name what he did made it pos­si­ble for me to tell oth­ers, and when telling them did not bring the roof of the world crash­ing down around my head, I found the strength I needed to con­front my abuse more fully by going to coun­sel­ing. In a very real sense, then, I owe to fem­i­nism what­ever heal­ing I have achieved.

If I stopped here, even those of you totally opposed to fem­i­nism would prob­a­bly be nod­ding your heads. “Of course you’re a fem­i­nist. It makes per­fect sense.” Yet to stop here would be to reduce fem­i­nism to a kind of self-help ide­ol­ogy, implic­itly deny­ing that fem­i­nism is also a pol­i­tics. More to the point, it would be to gloss over the fact that com­mit­ting myself to those pol­i­tics has been part and par­cel of my healing.

Not too long after I first read Adri­enne Rich’s essay, I was work­ing as a sum­mer camp super­vi­sor in New York’s Hud­son Val­ley. The leader of a train­ing ses­sion we were required to attend told us he would use the word she as the generic pro­noun when dis­cussing how to deal with campers who might choose to tell us that they’d been sex­u­ally abused. Since most abuse hap­pened to girls, he explained, refer­ring to both boys and girls as vic­tims would give us a skewed pic­ture of real­ity, mak­ing it dif­fi­cult for us to respond appro­pri­ately. I felt like I’d been punched in the stom­ach. It wasn’t just that he so blithely dis­missed my expe­ri­ence. What he said seemed to imply that the sex­ual abuse of boys and the sex­ual abuse of girls were so rad­i­cally dif­fer­ent in nature that we could not talk about them in the same con­text. If that were true, it called into ques­tion every­thing I thought I’d been learn­ing from fem­i­nism, sug­gest­ing that the strength I’d been draw­ing from that learn­ing was based on a false premise.

My body rebelled at this idea. Each time I tried to tell myself that the ses­sion leader was right — because the weight of his exper­tise made it hard to think he wasn’t — I wanted to crawl out of my skin no dif­fer­ently than I had after the first time the old man in my build­ing touched me. Still, there was no deny­ing that the books I was read­ing said not one word about my expe­ri­ence. Girls and women were abused and exploited in those pages, not boys, and cer­tainly not men. I’d found myself in Rich’s essay, in other words, as well as in the other fem­i­nists texts I was read­ing, through a process of anal­ogy. To take another instance from “Cary­atid: Two Columns,” when Rich wrote about how the val­ues of our cul­ture “equat[e]…manhood…with the objec­ti­fi­ca­tion of another’s per­son and the dom­i­na­tion of another’s body,” I under­stood her to be describ­ing, with a chill­ing accu­racy, what the old man in my build­ing had done to me, even though she was talk­ing explic­itly about men’s sex­ual objec­ti­fi­ca­tion of women.

This anal­ogy only grew stronger as I began to see very pre­cise par­al­lels between the old man’s method of “seduc­ing” me — because that’s what I think he thought he was doing – and the meth­ods for get­ting women into bed that some of my male friends talked about using. I remem­ber, for exam­ple, a dorm room con­ver­sa­tion from when I was an under­grad­u­ate. The “stud” among us – call him Liam – was talk­ing about the kind of women with whom sex­ual suc­cess mat­tered to him the most. These were, he said, the women who resisted, the ones who made him work for it, forc­ing him to prove that he could bend them to his will — I think he actu­ally used those words — because get­ting them to have sex with him made him feel most like a man. As Liam described how he sized such women up, I sud­denly real­ized that the old man in my build­ing had sized me up as well, that he had to have been watch­ing me before the first time he said hello. I was a shy, awk­ward and needy kid, so he gave me the kind of atten­tion that would make me feel noticed and that I would there­fore want more of. Liam talked about this as the “stage of flat­tery.” Then, once the old man could see in me a grow­ing desire for his atten­tion, he must have assumed that I also desired (per­haps with­out real­iz­ing it) every­thing else he wanted to “give” me as well. Accord­ing to Liam, a woman who resisted at this stage really wanted sex but was afraid of being labeled “easy.” She needed to be “taken,” he said, so she could give up her self con­trol with­out feel­ing guilty. Fol­low­ing what I am sure was a sim­i­lar logic, the old man used the force he thought was nec­es­sary to push me past the fear he believed was keep­ing me from express­ing my true desire. How else to explain the ques­tion he asked me before my mem­ory goes blank, “But don’t you want me to love you?”

Iron­i­cally, this par­al­lel between the two men was com­fort­ing. It affirmed for me that there was no rea­son to believe my expe­ri­ence of abuse dif­fered in any essen­tial way from the expe­ri­ence of a girl or woman whom a man had sim­i­larly vio­lated. The ses­sion leader had to have been wrong. Yet there was also no avoid­ing the fact that the fem­i­nists I was read­ing placed me as a man in the same cat­e­gory as the two men I have been talk­ing about. Here, again, from “Cary­atid: Two Columns,” is Adri­enne Rich:

Rape is the ulti­mate out­ward phys­i­cal act of coer­cion and deper­son­al­iza­tion prac­ticed on women by men. Most male readers…would per­haps deny hav­ing gone so far: the hon­est would admit to fan­tasies, urges of lust and hatred, or lust and fear, or to a “harm­less” fas­ci­na­tion with pornog­ra­phy and sadis­tic art.

I was fas­ci­nated by pornog­ra­phy; I had fan­tasies that com­bined lust and fear; and it was impos­si­ble to miss the cyn­i­cal accu­sa­tion in Rich’s use of the word “per­haps.” More tellingly, though, and damn­ingly, I had to admit that when Liam explained what it took for him to feel sex­u­ally like a man, I could not help but mea­sure myself against the stan­dard he set. I didn’t have a girl­friend at the time, and I wasn’t hav­ing sex, and I’d be lying if I said that didn’t some­times make me feel inad­e­quate. How­ever, it was only after I met a woman who rejected me because I was not “man enough” in pre­cisely Liam’s terms that I began to under­stand how fully the sex­ual val­ues to which he sub­scribed were also val­ues I had in me, whether I wanted them or not.

I met “Ling” through one of her suit­e­m­ates, “Denise,” who sat next to me in the class I was tak­ing on Shakespeare’s come­dies. The three of us spent an after­noon talk­ing and jok­ing in the library when we were sup­posed to be study­ing, and we hit it off so well that soon I was walk­ing across cam­pus a cou­ple of times a week to hang out with them and “Naomi,” the third woman with whom they lived. Some­times, if I stayed too late, I’d sleep on the couch in their suite and go back to my own dorm in the morn­ing. One such night, Ling and I stayed up talk­ing on that couch. I don’t remem­ber a sin­gle thing we said except for the fact that she told me about her expe­ri­ence emi­grat­ing as a young girl from China to the United States, but I know I felt good as I walked back to my dorm the next morn­ing. I liked Ling a lot, and I hoped that our talk­ing might lead to a roman­tic relationship.

The day after that, I saw Ling on cam­pus walk­ing with Naomi past the library. I called out to them and ran over to say hello. Instead of say­ing hello back, how­ever, they started mock­ing me, call­ing me “lit­tle boy” and “cow­ard.” I couldn’t imag­ine they were doing any­thing other than jok­ing with me, so I started to laugh with them. When I tried to ask Ling how she did on the test she’d had that morn­ing, though, the two women backed away, laugh­ing even harder and hold­ing up their hands to tell me I shouldn’t come any closer. I was con­fused. I called that night, but Denise told me Ling wasn’t there and that it would prob­a­bly be a good idea if I didn’t call again. Ling had been very insulted that not once dur­ing the time we were talk­ing on the couch did I even try to kiss her. I called a cou­ple of more times after that, hop­ing I’d be able to tell Ling how much I really did like her, but the one time I got her on the phone she was so clearly not inter­ested in talk­ing to me that I stopped call­ing. I nei­ther saw nor spoke to her again.

I was heart­bro­ken. More than that, though, I was angry and ashamed. I replayed the whole night over and over in my mind, try­ing to fig­ure out which raised eye­brow or touch on my arm or sig­nif­i­cant gaze I should have under­stood as Ling’s cue that it was time for me to kiss her. I just could not see what she clearly thought should have been obvi­ous. I tried to imag­ine how the night might have gone dif­fer­ently, cre­at­ing a sce­nario in which I leaned over and kissed Ling gen­tly at the edge of her mouth, as if I’d been aim­ing for her cheek and missed. She sat back, looked at me for a long moment, and then, of course, kissed me in return. Each time I played this scene in my head, how­ever, my anger and shame only increased. I still didn’t under­stand how I was sup­posed to have known that Ling wanted me to kiss her. As my sense of inad­e­quacy grew, the sting of Ling’s mock­ery grew as well, and I started to think that maybe I was indeed no bet­ter than the weak, cow­ardly and inef­fec­tual lit­tle boy she and her friend had told me that I was.

Once again, though, my body rebelled, and a nau­sea rose in me. Instead of mak­ing me want to crawl out of my own skin, though, this nau­sea was accom­pa­nied by a rage that pro­pelled me past Ling’s skin and into her body. Now, in the scenes I played in my head, I saw myself “tak­ing her” the way Liam had described “tak­ing” women who were afraid of seem­ing too “easy,” except I didn’t real­ize I was fol­low­ing Liam’s script. Then, once, as I imag­ined myself putting my hands on either side of Ling’s face to hold her still while I kissed her, I had a sense mem­ory of the old man in my build­ing putting his hands on the back of my head to pull my mouth towards him. I was mor­ti­fied. I spent the rest of that day alone, try­ing every­thing I could think of to twist what I had imag­ined into a shape that was not what it was: pre­cisely the kind of rape fan­tasy that Adri­enne Rich had writ­ten about. The fact that Ling might truly have wanted me to “take her” — whatever “tak­ing” might have meant to her — was beside the point. What mat­tered was that I’d imag­ined myself “tak­ing her” out of rage, to prove I was a man, not in response to any­thing I knew about Ling’s actual feel­ings or desires. In Rich’s words, I had “equat[ed my]…manhood…with the objec­ti­fi­ca­tion of another’s per­son and the dom­i­na­tion of another’s body.”

I swore I would do every­thing in my power to unlearn that equation.

At the heart of my fem­i­nism, then, is a para­dox. On the one hand, as a sur­vivor of male sex­ual vio­lence, I stand with women against the cul­ture of man­hood which pro­duces that vio­lence and which the vio­lence in turn per­pet­u­ates. On the other hand, as a man, I am — I have no choice but to be — impli­cated in that vio­lence. The chal­lenge with which fem­i­nism con­fronts me is to make sure that I never allow myself to stand on the same side as my abuser. Meet­ing this chal­lenge has not been easy. It is often uncom­fort­able to call other men out on their sex­ism; and it can be sim­i­larly uncom­fort­able when some­one calls me out on mine. Per­haps the most dif­fi­cult thing, how­ever, has been resist­ing the temp­ta­tion to wear my sex­ual abuse as a badge of dif­fer­ence, as if hav­ing been forcibly pen­e­trated by another man — because I am con­vinced that what I can­not fully remem­ber did in fact hap­pen — had some­how emp­tied me of the man­hood I was try­ing to prove in my fan­tasy with Ling, the same man­hood that Liam val­ued so highly and that is at the root of male sex­ual violence.

Because I have been coerced into the posi­tion that this kind of man­hood usu­ally reserves for women, in other words, it is easy to feel that my rela­tion­ship to this man­hood is essen­tially the same as a woman’s. Yet what­ever else may be true about the fact that I was sex­u­ally abused, the social and cul­tural con­text in which that abuse exists does not por­tray either the boy I was or the man I am as a sex­ual object in the way that it per­va­sively por­trays women. Nor am I sub­jected to the daily depre­da­tions of misog­yny and dis­crim­i­na­tion, indi­vid­ual and insti­tu­tional, that women expe­ri­ence because of their sta­tus as sex­ual objects. Finally, because I am a het­ero­sex­ual man, there is no escap­ing the fact that both the plea­sure this objec­ti­fi­ca­tion is designed to deliver and the advan­tages it is sup­posed to con­fer are meant quite explic­itly for me.

It is, in other words, as if there are two voices speak­ing within me: the voice of the man who is try­ing to own up to and change the cul­ture of male sex­ual vio­lence and the voice of the man who, as that culture’s vic­tim, feels like he has noth­ing to own up to. Inte­grat­ing these two voices has been the defin­ing chal­lenge of my life, per­son­ally, pro­fes­sion­ally and cre­atively. I called my first book of poetry The Silence of Men because I was break­ing the silence in my life that had resulted from keep­ing these two voices sep­a­rate. More, I hoped my poems would speak to and for men whose lives were shot through with a sim­i­lar silence. Writ­ing essays like this one also lets each of the men inside me have his say, allow­ing me to speak about what the old man in my build­ing did to me, while still doing jus­tice to the com­plex rela­tion­ship between who I am because of what he did and the man I have been taught I am sup­posed to be.

Fem­i­nism showed me how to con­nect the old man’s inhu­man­ity to the inhu­man­ity of what I have been taught; and fem­i­nism is the only pol­i­tics I can name that explic­itly com­mits itself to a world in which that kind of inhu­man­ity is no longer accept­able. That is why I am a fem­i­nist man.

Cross posted from The Take­back.

Portrait in Quotes: JoAnn Wypijewiski on “Can Marriage Be Saved?”

“[Adul­tery] promises no new begin­nings, no sec­ond chance for monogamy, for the “good mar­riage” this time, with the good wife and good hus­band in which no one is ever inse­cure, ever needy beyond the embrace of home, ever even intrigued; in which every­one is happy, while hap­pi­ness wreaks its impos­si­ble demands. Yet adul­tery rarely brings absolute rup­ture. Most adul­ter­ers don’t leave home for wed­ded bliss with their lover. What adul­tery brings is some­thing harder, a con­fronta­tion with the lie and, beyond the bric-à-brac of for­bid­den love, with plain old desire in a monogamy sys­tem in which sex is cur­rency, with­held as pun­ish­ment, doled out as reward, or some­times just another thing on a To Do list that is already too long.

Of course, the lie is more com­fort­ing than its unmask­ing, and so the “other woman,” ghoul of mar­ried women’s fears, is a horned thing, sym­bol of fail­ure, delu­sion, self­ish­ness. The dark angel, she is as nec­es­sary to the totem of the ideal wife as the hell­fire is to heaven. But is it rea­son­able, or just an arti­cle of faith in the mar­riage reli­gion, that apos­tates must all be cyn­ics or manip­u­la­tors? A woman I know, sin­gle, 50-ish and by chance or design long involved with mar­ried men, answered the ques­tion this way:

“The fact is a lot of us are sin­gle and the longer we insist on that the smaller the pool becomes of sin­gle inter­est­ing men. Now, the boxes lined up con­ven­tion­ally for some­one like me are celibacy, com­puter dat­ing, husband-hunting, bro­ken heart. No thank you. So I see these men, and let’s just say we engage in a free love. I don’t expect them to leave their wives. I want their inter­est and their care, inti­mately, men­tally, and I offer them the same. They go home to their wives. I don’t know what they say or do about that, and it’s not my busi­ness. They love their wives, or need them, or need their fam­i­lies, or need the image of them­selves that comes along with twenty-five years of mar­riage or what­ever even if love is dead, and maybe it was never alive in the first place. Or maybe it’s good, but how much can it give? Life demands a lot, you know, and some­times a per­son just needs to be weak. Or just needs, wants, a dif­fer­ent kind of lov­ing. We act as if com­fort were evil — and curios­ity, God for­bid! For the time I’m with these men I know some­thing deep and lov­ing occurs. Apart from every­thing else, I am their inti­mate friend. We’re talk­ing years here. The Dr. Phils of the world would say that I’m a fool. The gay men that I know get it com­pletely. The women mostly I don’t dis­cuss this with. It isn’t per­fect, but noth­ing is. And I’d be lying to say I never want for more. In the pie-in-the-sky there’s always the ‘great love,’ the soul mate and com­rade and lover com­bined. It’s a wish; it hap­pens or it doesn’t, and, let’s face it, most of the time it doesn’t. But we live in a tyranny of the cou­ple. Only sin­gle peo­ple under­stand this. And I guess what I resent most is the assump­tion that there is only way for love, and if you haven’t found it, or if your man ‘strays’ or if you are the one he’s ‘stray­ing’ with, then you’ve failed. I don’t think these guys’ wives have failed any more than I think the men have or I have. The sup­posed experts on love can hawk all the stuff they want about com­mit­ment, denial, avoid­ance, and peo­ple can lap it up and repeat it back to their sin­gle friends and their chil­dren. But at the end of the day there’re still all these bro­ken mar­riages, all these bro­ken hearts, all these needs unmet. The rules for love ever­last­ing are a bit like the rules for mak­ing it in the oppor­tu­nity soci­ety, where really noth­ing is equal and noth­ing is fair.”

Maybe instead of ask­ing whether mar­riage can be saved, we might think about how love is achieved, and not just couple-love, contract-love, but love in com­mon too?”

–JoAnn Wyp­i­jew­ski, “Can Mar­riage Be Saved,” The Nation, July 5 2004

Fragments of Evolving Manhood: Korea 4

I was lean­ing against the entrance to the Shin­chon sub­way sta­tion watch­ing peo­ple turn the cor­ner into the Semaeul Shi­jang, the out­door mar­ket where I bought rice each week and where my friend Mr. Kim had bar­gained one of the ven­dors down from the price she was going to charge me for a blan­ket because I was migook saram, an Amer­i­can, to what she would nor­mally charge a Korean. I’d just fin­ished lunch, a bowl of kim­chi chi­gae, and I had no place to be, so I just stood there, enjoy­ing the sun, smil­ing at the peo­ple who could not help but stare at my very con­spic­u­ous west­ern pres­ence and laugh­ing with the chil­dren who, when they passed by, also couldn’t help them­selves. “Migook saram! Migook saram!” they would yell out and point, as if I were some rare ani­mal they’d sighted, or as if a char­ac­ter from one of their favorite sto­ry­books had come to life. One group of kids, about four or five of them – maybe they were sib­lings – stopped right in front of me, but when they called out to their mother, who was a cou­ple of steps ahead of them, and also to every­one else who was pass­ing by, and to as far beyond our imme­di­ate vicin­ity as their voices would reach, that I was an Amer­i­can, I gave in to a mis­chie­vous­ness I’d been con­tem­plat­ing for some time and, instead of nod­ding and smil­ing, looked from side to side, gave them an excited, quizzi­cal look and asked, “Odio?” Where? If only I’d had my cam­era with me. The look of sur­prise that froze their faces when they heard me speak Korean is some­thing I  wish I’d been able to capture.

A few min­utes after they left, laugh­ing and wav­ing and call­ing out anyige­seyo, good­bye, an old woman wear­ing tra­di­tional Korean cloth­ing passed by. She had a cig­a­rette in her mouth, glasses on her nose and her hair was pulled back into a tight bun. She walked with her hands clasped behind her; and her back was bent, as if she were car­ry­ing some­thing heavy; and, as if she were lost in deep con­tem­pla­tion, she took slow, delib­er­ate steps, clearly not in a rush and clearly assum­ing that peo­ple would make way for her. She got about four of those steps past where I was stand­ing and stopped. She lifted her head and I could see that she was mut­ter­ing some­thing to her­self. Then she turned around, her mouth still mov­ing, and walked straight towards where I was stand­ing. She stopped in front of me, looked me up and down, mut­ter­ing what I thought at first was gib­ber­ish, since it sounded like nei­ther Korean nor Eng­lish, but after fif­teen sec­onds or so, I began to make out words like “tall,” “hand­some,” “strong” and then “American.”

She moved a lit­tle closer and put her hand on my bare fore­arm, a ges­ture to which I had become accus­tomed from rid­ing the sub­way. Kore­ans often have less body hair than white peo­ple and so the hair on my arms and on my chest, which was vis­i­ble if I was wear­ing an open-necked shirt, was a con­stant source of fas­ci­na­tion. Wher­ever I went on the train, older Korean women – who, because they live in a cul­ture where age is ven­er­ated, can do pretty much what they want – would sit next to me and stroke the hair on my arms, smil­ing and chat­ting ami­ably with me as they did so. This woman, how­ever, when she was fin­ished with my fore­arm ran her hand up to my bicep and gave a quick squeeze; then she laid her other hand flat against my stom­ach and moved it down quickly to cup and pat my crotch through my jeans, smil­ing and nod­ding her head as if she were eval­u­at­ing me and was pleased at what she was finding.

This all hap­pened so quickly that I had no time to react, and since she was stand­ing directly in front me, there was no way for me to get away from her with­out push­ing her, and she was so small and so frag­ile look­ing, and I did not want to make a scene, so I con­tin­ued to stand there; and then she was look­ing up at me, still smil­ing, and her eyes were bright, with­out pre­tense, though they held also an imp­ish mis­chie­vous­ness, and she asked me in a slightly accented Eng­lish, “Are you Amer­i­can?” Sur­prised that I was able to under­stand her, I hes­i­tated for half a sec­ond before answer­ing, and she put her hand on my arm and asked again, “Are you an American?”

“Yes,” I said, and she tight­ened her grip on my arm just a lit­tle bit. “Why you here alone? Come with me. Room-café around the cor­ner; I will pay for you.” She reached into her pocket and pulled out a very thick wad of bills.

“No, thank you,” I said. “I am wait­ing for a friend.”

“But it’s no good you out here alone,” she insisted, giv­ing another gen­tle tug on my arm. “Really, I will pay,” and she again showed me the money in her hand.

Room-cafes were just what they sounded like: cafes with pri­vate rooms where men went to be “enter­tained” in ways not so dif­fer­ent from the way Mr. Park and I had been enter­tained in Miari. I knew which room-café the old woman was talk­ing about since I’d walked past it many times on my way in and out of the mar­ket, though I’d never gone in. It was called Sing-Sing. Once, when I was com­ing home very late at night, after the café had closed, the women who worked there were sit­ting out­side, smok­ing and chat­ting – some of them were eat­ing kim bop–when one of them, a tall woman in a tight neon green dress, with nail pol­ish and eye­liner to match, called out to me, “Hey! You like what you see?” Her com­pan­ions laughed. I smiled and kept walking.

The old woman held up her wad of money one more time. “No,” I answered again. “Maybe next time” – the polite thing to say – “I really need to be here to meet my friend.”

She let go of my arm, but she didn’t walk away. “Are you a sol­dier?” She sounded just like the woman who’d chased me on Chong-no.

“No, I’m a teacher.”

“A teacher!” The woman’s face lit up as she put her money back in her pocket. “Teach me some Eng­lish while you wait your friend?” She took my hand and started to walk towards the mar­ket. The change in her man­ner and her tone – she was polite and def­er­en­tial, in stark con­trast to the almost demand­ing tone she took in her insis­tence that I let her take me to the room-café – also reminded me of the woman who’d chased me on Chong-no, and my curios­ity got the bet­ter of me, so I let her lead me where she wanted to go. She stopped to point at the dif­fer­ent fruits on a stand that we passed – apples, grapes, pears, oranges – and asked me the words for them in Eng­lish; then we stood in front of a cart on which the mer­chant had very care­fully arranged alarm clocks, blowdry­ers, hair curlers, elec­tric shavers and other small home appli­ances. After that, it was a cloth­ing stall, where she asked me the words for pants, shirt, belt and under­wear. Finally, she picked up a pack­age of women’s socks. “Will you buy these for me?” she asked.

“Sure,” I said, tak­ing them from her. I hadn’t for­got­ten about the money in her pocket, but I’d started to like her, and I wanted to do some­thing nice for her. I also felt sud­denly a lit­tle bit like one of those young men in the fairy tales who meets and is tested by the old hag, who is really a witch or sor­cer­ess in dis­guise, who, depend­ing on the story, either rewards the young man’s kind­ness or pun­ishes his cru­elty. So I paid the 1,200 or so won that the socks cost and handed them over to the woman. She turned the pack­age over and over as if she no longer rec­og­nized what it was, and I real­ized that she had expected me to say no. “Do you smoke?” she asked.

“No.”

“Good! Do you drink?”

“Some­times, but not very much.”

“Good! Come sit here with me.” She pointed to an empty space on the steps in front of a closed store. ” You know, I lived in Amer­ica. Once. In Cal­i­for­nia. Dur­ing the war. Sol­diers call me mamasan.” She didn’t say which war, but I guessed it was the Korean war, and I knew from the lit­tle bit of hang­ing out I’d done in Itae­won, the part of Seoul where the Amer­i­can army was sta­tioned, that if the sol­diers had called her mamasan, it meant she’d been a madame.

We talked a lit­tle while longer. She asked me about my life back in the United States, about where I lived and worked in Seoul, about the kinds of Korean foods I liked. She told me she had a daugh­ter with whom she lived and she asked if I would like to have din­ner with them that night. By now, I was com­pletely dis­armed, and I thought it would be a very inter­est­ing expe­ri­ence, and so I said yes. She stood up imme­di­ately and started lead­ing me away from the mar­ket. I had a brief moment of anx­i­ety when I real­ized I had no idea where she was tak­ing me, but I set that aside and walked qui­etly beside her for about five min­utes or so, until she looked at me out of the cor­ner of her eye and smiled slyly. “Maybe next time, you and I enjoy in bed together,” she said.

I walked in silence for a few more steps as I tried to decide whether or not she was jok­ing with me and how to respond if she was; but then I real­ized it didn’t mat­ter. I no longer felt safe going with her to a part of Seoul with which I was unfa­mil­iar and so I decided to “remem­ber” a call I was expect­ing that night from my mother in Amer­ica. I needed to be home to get the call, I explained, because my mother and I had some impor­tant busi­ness to dis­cuss. The old woman looked dis­ap­pointed. She took out the socks I’d bought for her, removed the card­board back­ing from the pack­age and wrote down her phone num­ber. “When you want, you call me. We have din­ner. Okay?”

“Okay,” I said. We told each other good­bye and I started walk­ing back in the direc­tion from which we’d come. I turned once to look at her again, but the street had become sud­denly crowded and I couldn’t see her. I looked at the piece of card­board. She’d writ­ten “din­ner” and then a phone num­ber, and then “Love, Mamasan.”

I didn’t want to go back to my apart­ment right away, so I walked instead to the Lotte World depart­ment store. I knew some of the peo­ple who’d worked on the indoor amuse­ment park and roller coaster that every­one was talk­ing about, and I’d been mean­ing to check it out for some time. Since I hate roller coast­ers, though, I did not ride it. Instead I wan­dered around the store a bit, until I found on one of the top floors a large foun­tain around which peo­ple were sit­ting. I bought myself a straw­berry ice cream and took a seat at the water’s edge, eat­ing slowly and think­ing about the old woman whose phone num­ber I had in my pocket.

I was star­ing off into space, not look­ing at any­thing or any­one in par­tic­u­lar, but a woman sit­ting with her daugh­ter on her lap on the other side of the foun­tain must have thought I was look­ing at them because she nod­ded her head and smiled. I nod­ded and smiled back, just to be polite, and the woman’s daugh­ter left her lap almost imme­di­ately and started walk­ing towards me. When she reached the spot where I was sit­ting, she climbed with­out a word into my lap and sat there gaz­ing silently at my face for about ten or fif­teen sec­onds. Then, still with­out speak­ing, she reached behind me for the water in the foun­tain, trust­ing the arm I raised to keep her from falling. When she sat back down, she opened one of my hands, palm up, and held her fin­ger­tips above it, let­ting the drops she’d gath­ered drip onto my skin. When the last drops had fallen, she climbed down to return to her mother, never once glanc­ing back in my direc­tion. The mother stood up, took her daughter’s hand, smiled at me, nod­ding one more time, and then led the girl into the ele­va­tor, which car­ried them down into the rest of their day.

My day took me next to din­ner in the restau­rant where I first prac­ticed read­ing hangul, the Korean alpha­bet, by order­ing each time I ate there a dif­fer­ent item from the menu that was posted on the wall. Two of my col­leagues, Tom and Gavin, were already eat­ing when I walked in. They invited me to join them, which I did, and we decided that we’d meet later that night at the Gilbert Stand­bar, which was also in the Semaeul Shi­jang, a few doors down from the room-café the old woman had offered to take me to. I arrived at the Gilbert about fif­teen min­utes late, but my friends were not there, and so I sat by myself at Ms. Park’s sta­tion – she insisted on Ms. and not Miss – ordered a beer and some fruit and set­tled in to wait. My friends never showed up, but that night at the Gilbert turned out to be, in some ways, a fit­ting end­ing to a day in which an old woman grabbed my crotch in pub­lic and a lit­tle girl who was a com­plete stranger sat in my lap and dripped water on my palm.

A stand­bar is what we would call today, here in the US, a karaōke bar, though since this was in the late 1980s, before dig­i­tal tech­nol­ogy made karaōke juke­boxes pos­si­ble, the music to which patrons paid to sing along was live, pro­vided some­times by an entire band and some­times by a sin­gle key­board or piano player. As far as I know, the term stand­bar – I don’t think it’s much in use any­more; a google search turned up prac­ti­cally noth­ing – comes from the fact that there are bar sta­tions, or “stands,” arranged around the room at which sit the host­esses whose job it is to enter­tain the cus­tomers, who are almost always men. This enter­tain­ment includes pour­ing drinks, serv­ing food, going up on stage to sing when their cus­tomers do and danc­ing blues, slow danc­ing. The women are also often avail­able for sex – though, as it was explained to me by my Korean friend, if the sug­ges­tion for sex comes from the woman, you don’t have to pay for it.

The one or two stand­bars to which my Korean friends had taken me reminded me of a cross between the more extreme excesses of the disco era and the stereo­typ­i­cally sleazy Asian “girly bars” that are so famil­iar from the early James Bond movies. The Gilbert, how­ever, was more of a neigh­bor­hood place. There were no disco balls or flash­ing lights; the host­esses dressed very casu­ally – jeans and a but­ton down shirt, for exam­ple – as opposed to the tighter, glitzier often more reveal­ing out­fits the host­esses wore in other stand­bars; and there was, in gen­eral, a much more laid back atmos­phere. In fact, my col­leagues and I learned after we’d been going there for a while that it was the place where the men and women who worked at other sex trade estab­lish­ments came to relax.

This dif­fer­ence, of course, was one of degree not kind. The same things that went on at other stand­bars went on at the Gilbert, only more qui­etly and dis­cretely; and, most impor­tantly to me and my friends, no one made a spec­ta­cle out of us because we were west­ern­ers. The host­esses were not con­stantly ask­ing us for (wink, wink, nudge, nudge) “pri­vate Eng­lish lessons;” the other patrons were not con­stantly com­ing up to us to buy us drinks or prac­tice their Eng­lish. We were able, in general, just to hang out, drink a few beers and sing a few songs, just like reg­u­lar customers.

Ms. Park was the host­ess at whose sta­tion we always sat, and, over time, she and I became friendly. My Korean was bet­ter than that of my col­leagues, and so I could make very sim­ple con­ver­sa­tion, about the weather, for exam­ple, or food; about our jobs – she was very funny when describ­ing the men who’d sat at her sta­tion whom she didn’t like– and a lit­tle bit about my life in the US. She told me very lit­tle about her­self, though we did talk about books; she liked to read and she was fas­ci­nated by the fact that I was a poet. She intro­duced me once to a man who did not come to the Gilbert reg­u­larly, but whom she seemed to know pretty well, telling me he too was a poet. He gave me a copy of one of his books, though I lost it a long time ago, and I can­not now remem­ber his name.

Over time, I began to real­ize that when­ever Ms. Park danced blues with me – just because I would have been per­fectly happy not to dance with her did not exempt her from doing her job – she stayed in my arms a few beats longer than the end of the song, which is what hap­pened on this night, but then, she stayed there even longer, gaz­ing at me and grin­ning a sat­is­fac­tion she offered to share when she asked if she could come to my apart­ment after work. I wanted her in that moment as well, and so I said yes. I gave her my address and phone num­ber and we went back to her station. Waiting for us, how­ever, was a thin, bald­ing man in a crum­pled gray busi­ness suit and thick-framed nerdy glasses. As soon as Ms. Park sat down, he com­manded her to fill my glass, not from the bot­tle of inex­pen­sive beer that I’d ordered, but from the bot­tle of Chivas that he had in his hand. This kind of behav­ior was out of char­ac­ter for the Gilbert, as was the fact that he did not ask Ms. Park drink with us, and I was imme­di­ately uncom­fort­able. I looked at Ms. Park, but her face was frozen in her best customer-service smile, betray­ing noth­ing of what she might be feeling.

The thin man toasted me as if she weren’t there, waited till my class was empty and then pointed at Ms. Park with a fin­ger that was unusu­ally thick, given how skinny the man was. “Do you like her?” he asked, not deign­ing even to glance in her direction. Because I knew where the con­ver­sa­tion was headed, I did not answer him and told Ms. Park that I wanted more kol­bengi. She got up and went into the kitchen, and I tried as hard as I could, while she was gone, to let the thin man know I was not inter­ested in talk­ing to him by focus­ing my atten­tion on the very drunk, immac­u­lately groomed silver-haired man try­ing to sing John Denver’s “Coun­try Road” with­out falling over onto the host­ess who was stand­ing under his shoul­der to prop him up.

The man with the Chivas bot­tle did not take the hint, how­ever, and he fell silent as well, sit­ting with closed eyes until Ms. Park returned with my food. Once she was sit­ting down again, he leaned over and said qui­etly in my ear, “Isn’t she pretty? Don’t you like her?” When I still didn’t answer and kept my eyes focused on the silver-haired man, who was now stum­bling back to his seat, my unin­vited and unwel­come com­pan­ion put his hand on my arm and said more loudly, “She has beau­ti­ful labia.”

Still I said noth­ing; still I would not look at him.

“Don’t you under­stand?” He was not quite shout­ing as he pulled from his pocket a wad of bills almost as thick as the one the old woman had pulled out of her pocket ear­lier in the day. “Korea is a par­adise for men! Here!” He waved the money in my face. “You can have her if you want.”

I real­ized at this point that I had to say some­thing, but I also under­stood that what­ever I said had to be cal­cu­lated not to esca­late the sit­u­a­tion, and so instead of say­ing what I wanted to say – some ver­sion of “Stop talk­ing about her like that and get the fuck away from me!” – I said instead some­thing that would get him to leave me alone, while allow­ing him to save face, “Maybe next time. Tonight, I am very tired and I just want to drink by myself.”

My words had the desired result. He looked at me, looked for the first time at Ms. Park, gave a snort of dis­gust and walked back towards his table just as his friends were com­ing over to pull him away.

For the rest of that night, Ms. Park refused to meet my gaze, but each time I went to the Gilbert after that, and in all the time before I left Seoul, she con­tin­ued to dance with me the same as always; even as I watched her belly swell gen­tly and then flat­ten out again over the course of three or so months, she danced with me a lit­tle closer and a lit­tle longer than the other men; and some­times I saw flashes of the smile she gave me when she asked if she could come to my apart­ment, but she never brought that pos­si­bil­ity up again, and nei­ther did I. And we talked just as we always had, though she was more reveal­ing about her­self than she had been before, telling me often about the man who’d promised to marry her. All he needed, she said, was enough money to buy a place for them to live, and she said he’d told her that he didn’t care if his mother dis­owned him. She was the woman he wanted.

I have no idea if this man really existed, though I hope he did, and I hope he kept his promise and that Ms. Park was able to stop work­ing at the Gilbert and be, sim­ply, hap­pily, his wife. I hope she has chil­dren and that they have brought her great plea­sure. I hope all this, but I know the odds are against it being true, that she is more likely to have had a very dif­fi­cult life; and so right now, as I remem­ber Ms. Park, what I choose to remem­ber is how deeply she smiled when she asked if we could be together, not because of any­thing hav­ing to do with the sex that didn’t hap­pen, but because I could see in that smile that the thought of being with me made her happy and it’s more painful than I want to feel right now to remem­ber her any other way.