Home

Click here
to email me!

For now, Selections from Saadi's Bustan is available for purchase only from me. Click here
to buy it from my online store. The Silence Of Men can be purchased there as well.

 

 

Self-Portrait In Quotes

This is a self-portrait of me as a reader, using as brushstrokes and colors passages from what I am reading that have moved me enough to write them down.  

from Gout: The Patrician Malady

But why a book about gout? Is that not (one anticipates the objections) a rather trifling the condition? Perhaps comic, a topic tailor-made for the belles lettres of a bygone age but not for sober medical history. Nowadays gout provokes enormous condescension of slimline political correctness. Wasn't it, surely, a disease of the ancien regime and the Old World? Didn't the idle and licentious bring it on their own heads, or rather feet, by outrageous overindulgence, while they shrugged off responsibility by the solemn palaver of dignifying their condition as 'the gout,' as if it were some boon companion or noble foe to whom it was a great 'honour' to fall martyr? He and his physician' were very well satisfied with the proceedings of the Gout', Edward Gibbon explained to his step-mother: 'he had behaved like a fair and honourable Enemy'. Recycling that stock simile, the Revd Sydney Smith quipped that gout was 'the only enemy that I do not wish to have at my feet'. By means of this grim rigamarole, gout's sting was drawn, just as, in Shakespeare's time, one had to jest with death. 'I enjoy all the dignity of lameness,' bantered the gouty Samuel Johnson, making a virtue of necessity. 'I receive ladies and dismiss them sitting. Painful pre-eminence.'

Gout thus yields medical anecdotes and biographical insights. Does it offer more? We believe so [....] For one thing, the glaring neglect of gout draws attention to biases in medical history. Scholars have chiefly studied lethal, epidemic diseases: plagues and smallpox, yellow fever and typhoid fever, tuberculosis and AIDS. Such afflictions invite cathartic involvement: we share the horror, we pity the victims. But this concentration on killer epidemics arguably creates an imbalance that needs redressing. For the diseases causing most pain have not been apocalyptic: sickness has typically been less like the Holocaust than an interminable succession of stumbles and muggings—but no less agonizing for that. Historical pathology mainly consists of chronic conditions, attacking the musculoskeletal system, the respiratory system, the nervous system, and of course the brain—not in themselves fatl but incurable, typically debilitating, sometimes crippling and inordinately painful.

Gout falls into the category of non-infectious, non-lethal ailments. Though widely associated with the olden days—Christmas-card scenes peopled by ruddy-faced Mr Pickwicks drinking toasts—in truth gout is very much still with us; it continues to threaten males in the developed world, and globally it is spreading.

–Roy Porter and G. S. Rousseau

///

Form's Moon

See, I might return—

the truck's gassed, the map flat and likely
accurate—to where I'm dead to me

to you. This is autumn, say—it's late October,

mid-November. By then the road'll be choked
with leaves and other ruins, the trees with smoke

and ghosts of harm or not. (I've kept records

of these facts, these other shores.)
My song will make a veil, and yours

a mouthful of mirror. Seconds before we sing, I'll find I'm reading

the wading pool's dismal
little slaps to mean trouble. You'll punch an animal,

any animal. I'll touch a small bell.

The moon, itself a bell
of light, will make everything

loud. But what good is form's moon

if half a song won't fit the room? Come the platitudes, love.
Come whatever doesn't move.

–Graham Foust

///

Property Lines

I breathe beneath the blanket, this space is mine,
and mine the sigh when we are alone together,
I mark it so there is no mistake, mark the excitement
of valleys and canyons rippling along our sheets.
I exercise the right to mark my space. I walk downstairs,
this space is mine, a scent, a trace, my palm in the air
above the banisters, I watch you in the garden, this space
is mine, how you stretch and, for the last time today,
dig the soil under some wilted peonies.
Simple chores deceive me, I want to adjust my senses
to the wavelength of a song slipping through a window
in too short a breath, this space is my own, or so I say,
in love with modest shapes, clean and quiet and smaller
than your desire which knows no limit, pressing on
as messengers who long to get to where they must.
This space is mine, I am at home in the gaps between words,
in trills of falling, falling hair I twist around my body,
in this house, it is mine, this dream, it is mine,
this face that talks back to the mirror,
like a rip in all things that should be there
so a beam of light will keep streaming in,
light in this space that is no longer mine
covering you and me, you and me.

–Ales Debeljak, translated from the Slovenian by Andrew Zawacki and the author

///

Reclining on a Cushion

An early August morning that belongs to me,
like the mulberry that lives for the silkworm
forced to finish its commission
without haste, without mistrust.
I recognized you, don't worry.
Iodine and gold among low hills
of a Sunday approaching noon
which resembles, suspiciously, the contours
of your body. A warm rain fuzzes every
inch of skin, or so I think, and takes responsibility
for a fertile harvest; desire asks
a single question of us all. Don't worry,
I recognized you. So it is pointless to answer,
as there is no point in poignant tremors
while I watch you sleep. Countries and cities
throb beneath your eyelids, the main square
filling up as I am filled with your moans,
and I am finally called by my own name:
it is enough for me to know
to road goes on without end.

–Ales Debeljak, translated from the Slovenian by Andrew Zawacki and the author

///

The Illiterate

 
Touching your goodness, I am like a man
Who turns a letter over in his hand
And you might think this was because the hand
Was unfamiliar but, truth is, the man
Has never had a letter from anyone;
And now he is both afraid of what it means
And ashamed because he has no other means
To find out what it says than to ask someone.
 
His uncle could have left the farm for him,
Or his parents died before he sent them word,
Or the dark girl changed and want him for beloved.
Afraid and letter-proud, he keeps it with him.
What would you call his feeling for the words
That keep him rich and orphaned and beloved?
 
–William Meredith

///

Building Nicole's Mama

for the 6th grade class of Lillie C. Evans School, Liberty City, Miami

I am astonished at their mouthful names—
Lakinishia, Fumilayo, Chevellanie, Delayo—
their ragged rebellions and lip-glossed pouts,
and all those pants drooped as drapery.
I rejoice when they kiss my face, whisper wet
and urgent in my ear, make me their obsession
because I have brought them poetry.

They shout me raw, bruise my wrists with pulling,
and brashly claim me as mama as they
cradle my head in their little laps,
waiting for new words to grow in my mouth.

You.
You.
You.
Angry, jubilant, weeping poets—we are all
saviors, reluctant hosannas in the limelight,
but you knew they, didn't you? Then let us
bless this sixth grade class—40 nappy heads,
40 cracking voices, and all of them
raise their hands when I ask. They have all seen
the Reaper, grim in his heavy robe,
pushing the button for the dead project elevator,
begging for a break at the corner pawn shop,
cackling wildly in the back pew of the Baptist church.

I ask the death question and forty fists
punch the air, me!, me! And O'Neal,
matchstick crack child, watched his mother's
body become a claw, and 9-year-old Tiko Jefferson,
barely big enough to lift the gun, fired a bullet
into his own throat after Mama bended his back
with a lead pipe. Tamika cried into a sofa pillow
when Daddy blasted Mama into the north wall
of their cluttered one-room apartment,
Donya's cousin gone in a drive-by. Dark window,
click, click, gone, says Donya, her tiny finger
a barrel, the thumb a hammer. I am shocked
by their losses—and yet when I read a poem
about my own hard-eyed teenager, Jeffrey asks

He is dead yet?

It cannot be comprehended,
my 18-year-old still pushing and pulling
his own breath. And those 40 faces pity me,
knowing that I will soon be as they are,
numb to our bloodied histories,
favoring the Reaper with a thumbs-up and a wink,
hearing the question and shouting me, me,
Miss Smith, I know somebody dead!

Can poetry hurt us? they ask me before
snuggling inside my words to sleep.
I love you, Nicole says, Nicole wearing my face,
pimples peppering her nose, and she is as black
as angels are. Nicole's braids clipped, their ends
kissed with match flame to seal them,
and can you teach me to write a poem about my mother?
I mean, you write about your daddy and he dead,
can you teach me to remember my mama?

A teacher tells me this is the first time Nicole
has admitted that her mother is gone,
murdered by slim silver needles and a stranger
rifling through her blood, the virus pushing
her skeleton through for Nicole to see.
And now this child with rusty knees
and mismatched shoes sees poetry as her scream
and asks me for the words to build her mother again.
Replacing the voice.
Stitching on the lost flesh.

So poets,
as we pick up our pens,
as we flirt and sin and rejoice behind microphones—
remember Nicole.
She knows that we are here now,
and she is an empty vessel waiting to be filled.

And she is waiting.
And she
is
waiting.
And she waits.

–Patricia Smith

///

Three-Mountain Pass

A cliff face. Another. And still a third.
Who was so skilled to carve this craggy scene:

the cavern's red door, the ridge's narrow cleft,
the black knoll bearded with little mosses?

A twisting pine bough plunges in the wind,
showering a willow's leaves with glistening drops.

Gentlemen, lords, who could refuse, though weary
and shaky in his knees, to mount once more?

–Ho Xuan Hu'o'ng, translated by John Balaban

///

In his magnificent work After Babel: Aspects of Language and Translation (1975), George Steiner points out that translation, among other things, is a work of self-denial, demanding that the translator serve the original rather than imposing himself or herself on it. But he also points out that all translation, like all reading and even all listening, is a work of editing, a work of interpretation, determined by subjective and contextual factors. If the poet is a Maker and Creator, which indeed is the basic meaning of the word, then the translator is ideally a highly skilled craftsman. And we know that in ancient times, in both Eastern and Western civilization, craftsmen were slaves. Self-denial is one of the cardinal virtues of slaves. But as the task of translation also involves editing and interpreting, the translator must also serve as actor. The translator must imitate the author of the original work and his translation must be a likeness of the original work. The translator must never strive to surpass the author, although the literary qualities of a translation occasionally and for various reasons may appear to be superior to those of the original work. A skilled translator who masters the language into which he translates (normally his mother tongue) is bound to use to his best advantage such prosodic, euphonic, and musical effects as his language places at his disposal. In doing so, he may add to his translation features that are not present in the original work. Paradoxically, the more skilled the translator and the more acutely his ear is tuned to prosodic and musical features, the further his translation may deviate from the original text. A famous Swedish poet and man of letters of the 19th century once said, "Beautiful translations are like beautiful women, that is to say, they are not always the most faithful ones."

–N. G. D. Malmqvist, "On The Role of the Translator," Translation Review #70.

///

No man could ever understand what it's like to put a hand down between your boyfriend's legs and stick your fingers into his hot wet cunt, and feel his hand similarly searching its way into yours. It's a subtle competition; one of us is going to have to let go and roll over, to give in to the white noise building up in our cocks. I think this time it's going to be me. Almost reluctantly I pull out of him and arch up, giving him more leeway into me. Two fingers, then three, then four, then he's in past the knuckles and out from under me, and I'm screaming my way through a driving fuck. His hands are tiny, with long skinny fingers, a legacy of when he was a girl. My cunt is tighter than his, even though I've given birth, but it was twenty years ago and I didn't let too many single-gendered people fuck me very often.

–Raven Kaldera, "Defying Normal"

///

Love, how I'd love to slip down to the pond

Love, how I'd love to slip down to the pond,
                                             bathe with you close by on the bank.
Just for you I'd wear my new Memphis swimsuit,
                                             made of sheer linen, fit for a queen—
Come see how it looks in the water!

Couldn't I coax you to wade in with me?
                                              Let the cool creep slowly around us?
Then I'd dive deep down
                                              and come up for you dripping,
Let you fill your eyes
                                              with the little red fish that I'd catch.

And I'd say, standing there tall in the shallows:
Look at my fish, love,
                                              how it lies in my hand,
How my fingers caress it,
                                              slip down its sides…

But then I'd say softer,
                                              eyes bright with your seeing:
                                                                                A gift, love. No words.
                                              Come closer and
                                                                                look, it's all me.

–from the ancient Egyptian, translated by John L. Foster

///

XIX

my girl's tall with hard long eyes
as she stands,with her long hard hands keeping
silence on her dress,good for sleeping
is her long hard body filled with surprise
like a white shocking wire,when she smiles
a hard long smile it sometimes makes
gaily go clean through me tickling aches,
and the weak noise of her eyes easily files
my impatience to an edge—my girl's tall
and taut,with thin legs just like a vine
that's spent all of its life on a garden-wall,
and is going to die.     When we grimly go to bed
with these legs she begins to heave and twine
about me,and to kiss my face and head.

–e. e. cummings, Tulips and Chimneys, "Sonnets—Realities"

///

8.

it may not always be; and i say
that if your lips, which i have loved, should touch
another's, and your dear strong fingers clutch
his heart, as mine in time not far away;
if on another's face your sweet hair lay
in such a silence as i know, or such
great writhing words as, uttering overmuch,
stand helplessly before the spirit at bay;

if this should be, i say if this should be—
you of my heart, send me a little word;
that i may go unto him, and take his hands,
saying, Accept all happiness from me.
Then shall i turn my face, and hear one bird
sing terribly afar in the lost lands.

–e. e. cummings

///

Initiate

That wave hurtling along
at the speed of its own homelessness
is frantically searching its memory
for information that might help it survive
intact, but because it finds nothing except a habit
of smoothness, a long-term acquaintance
with the sky (that placid parallel existence
clearly about to be disrupted),
the wave concludes that this must be
its very first time.
It resolves for the sake of its tribe
to be brave, even though it’s nothing
but a quivering heap of bubbles
competing with each other to be
smallest, propelled in loops back & forth
as it tries vainly to unclench itself
within a space so narrow
& at a pace so languid
it has time to compose
an original song entitled
I Am a Pilgrim & a Stranger
just before it overbalances, crests,
& breaks at the precise instant when,
pondering whether it would be more terrifying
to imagine oneself as helpless,
propelled by forces utterly beyond control,
or as glaringly bright,
a wall of muscled glory
descending upon a quaking world,
it concludes that the answer is
yes.

–Claire Bateman

///

The Happy Prince

In the children's record of the Happy Prince,
before each gold flake is peeled from the Prince's body,
the voice orders, Turn the Page, Turn the Page,
supposing that children do not know when to turn,
and may live at one line for many years,
sliding and bouncing boisterously along the words,
breaking the closed letters for a warm place to sleep.
Turn the Page, Turn the Page.  By the time time the Happy Prince has lost his eyes,
and his melted heart is given to the poor,
and his body taken from the market-place and burned,
there is no need to order, Turn the Page,
for the children have grown up, and know when to turn,
and knowing when, will never again know where.
     

   –Janet Frame 

///

My terms [to describe the "mission" of the novel]—retrieval, recuperation, possession—have a severe corollary that goes with them: We cannot perceive or possess our life, on our own; we need stories. Experience washes through us from birth to death; life marks us incessantly, yes, but we cannot easily get our heads and hands around it, see its cumulative shape. And we can even less convey it to others. What a magic container a novel is! In the compass of a few hundred pages printed with letters, it can chart an entire life, from birth to death, delivering a plenary mix of thoughts, feelings, words, and deeds. Small wonder that novels gratify, that they answer a deep-seated need.

–Arnold Weinstein

///

Fragment

I gave you all that once I gave to God:
The grave allegiance of my lonely soul
That straightly burned like altar fire; the roll
Of solemn syllables; the flowering rod
Of faith; the thoughts that link this dreaming clod
To stars; my secret rosary—the whole
Brave ritual of names that chime and toll
The perfect worship I once gave to God.

–Henry Bellamann

///

While the human race battles itself, fighting over ever more crowded turf and scarcer resources, the advantage moves to the microbes' court. They are our predators and the will be victorious if we, Homo sapiens, do not learn how to live in a rational global village that affords the microbes few opportunities.

It's either that or we brace ourselves for the coming plague.

–Laurie Garrett, The Coming Plague

///

To Enter That Rhythm Where The Self Is Lost

To enter that rhythm where the self is lost,
where breathing : heartbeat : and the subtle music
of their relation make our dance, and hasten
us to the moment when all things become
magic, another possibility.
That blind moment, midnight, when all sight
begins, and the dance itself is all our breath,
and we ourselves the moment of life and death.
Blinded;     but given now another saving,
the self as vision, at all times perceiving,
all arts all senses being languages,
delivered of will, being transformed in truth —
for life's sake surrendering moment and images,
writing the poem;     in love making;     bringing to birth.

–Muriel Ruykeiser

///

To The One Who Can't Leave

From here to death may be a long road,
so stay with your wife.

Get home and be grateful.
The closet is waiting, ready for your coat.

Your children need you
to teach them the ways not to love.

Keep them safe with well-wrought lies.
Each child must have a sickness to grieve.

Let your loneliness be theirs.
They will know, you've managed for them.

It can be their slow guilt
as they climb you like rungs to the world.

–Beth Gylys

///

All That Time

I saw two trees embracing.
One leaned on the other
as if to throw her down.
But she was the upright one.
Since their twin youth, maybe she
had been pulling him toward her
all that time,

and finally almost uprooted him.
He was the thin, dry, insecure one,
the most wind-warped, you could see.
And where their tops tangled
it looked like he was crying
on her shoulder.
On the other hand, maybe he

had been trying to weaken her,
break her, or at least
make her bend
over backwards for him
just a little bit.
And all that time
she was standing up to him

the best she could.
She was the most stubborn,
the straightest one, that's a fact.
But he had been willing
to change himself—
even if it was for the worse—
all that time.

At the top they looked like one
tree, where they were embracing.
It was plain they'd be
always together.
Too late now to part.
When the wind blew, you could hear
them rubbing on each other.

–May Swenson

///

The Tao Of Longing

I am vexed with the most useless desires.
I want the smell of tallow in your hair
the ridges in the nails of your toes
the vein that wanders down your thigh
and the wheat in your voice.
I want the lick of salt
that hurries down your neck.
I want the air that you expel
that reels with the damp of your lungs
and the delirium of carbon dioxide.
And I want the moon, in its nest of clouds.
And the snap of acorns,
falling in the night.

–Michael Henson, published in Birmingham Poetry Review #30

///

He wasn't just interested in [sex], he liked it. Not all men did, contrary to popular lore, not in her experience. Many men purported to be interested in sex, to be after only one thing and all that, and then when it came right down to actual contact they didn't really delight in it, they could easily be oddly unmoved. It was as if it involved too much interaction. Their attentions were often aloof and rather cool, as if they couldn't quite inhabit them.... So she appreciated it when a man seemed genuinely interested in women, even if that interest ended up being directed at whatever girl happened to be crossing his path, or sitting beside him at dinner, or bringing him his cup of coffee. Along with Benjamin's disorganization and democratic taste in women was a lack of having formulated strong ideas about how a woman ought to be or about trying to get her to act in a certain way. He had a lack of expectation that a woman be demure or obedient or fun or whatever it was a man supposedly wanted a woman to be. Benjamin just seemed to like how women were. She liked that open, lax attitude. It allowed her to be how she was. It allowed her to be free.

–Susan Minot, Rapture

///

...wait, was Kay saying something? She must be getting tired. At least, a little. but he shouldn't think of that, of her getting tired. When he thought of her, it made him lose, in a weird way, some of his enjoyment. Which was ironic, this being sex. You'd think that if you were having sex with someone, thinking of them would intensify it, but sometimes it was the opposite. Sometimes, if you were concerned, it was best not to think of them at all. Concern wasn't part of the drive. The drive was, ultimately, to invade her, overpower her, not protect her. The protective feeling appeared at other times, but not during sex. so much missing was the protective feeling that Benjamin marveled that women actually liked it, which they definitely appeared to at times. They liked being penetrated that way. It was when they didn't seem to be enjoying themselves that it made more sense to him. It never ceased to surprise him when they did.

He'd better empty his mind. Everything always moved along more smoothly when there was no real thought going on.

–Susan Minot, Rapture

///

Kay used sex as a gauge, despite its paradoxes. She found it easier to read the signals she got from touching someone than to make the more complex discernments of character having to do with responsibility and honor. Those qualities mattered to her, but overshadowing them was the vague but weightier notion of the life force in a person, a person's bigness of heart. A person willing to make contact with other people—that was one of the most appealing things. And people who were struggling. They were appealing, too. Usually the people struggling happened to be messes, but that was because they were taking in more of life. Intact people had ruled a lot of things out. They were less open. It was easy to see the openness in people who were wrecks. And, she had noticed, wrecks were often more likely to give a high priority to sex.

–Susan Minot, Rapture

///

The Church...has always known that its greatest rival...is the ravishing focus of our bodies.

–Robert Olen Butler, They Whisper

///

Transformation

I haven't written a single poem
in months.
I've lived humbly, reading the paper,
pondering the riddle of power
and the reasons for obedience.
I've watched sunsets
(crimson, anxious),
I've heard the birds grow quiet
and night's muteness.
I've seen sunflowers dangling
their heads at dusk, as if a careless hangman
had gone strolling through the gardens.
September's sweet dust gathered
on the windowsill and lizards
hid in the bends of walls.
I've taken long walks,
craving one thing only:
lightning,
transformation, you.

–Adam Zagajewski, translated by Clare Cavanagh

///

...there are little things you do to mute your response to a woman you want but you shouldn't want because of reasons that have nothing to do with the two ofyou. another man in love with her, for instance, a man she's made a commitment to. So you make yourself look away. You don't say anything. There is no persuasion. You love this woman but you care about the other man by the passivity you preserve with regard to your passion. The passion chooses you. The love chooses you. All you have to resist it is your breathless passivity.

And I pushed away from the dinner table that night in careful preservation of that passivity and I wobbled down the hallway and into the bathroom and I closed the door and I slipped the bolt and this was a time when the only formal impediment was another man in Sam's life, when no promises had yet been spoken between Fiona and me. It's true that I loved Fiona, loved her already as richly and powerfully as I would later. But if Sam had come and knocked softly at the bathroom door and whispered, Ira, please open the door for a moment, then I would have unlocked the door—even though I had slipped the bolt deliberately—and I would have opened the door, and even though I would not lift my arms to her right away I would look her in the eyes and if she yes there, if she whispered again, not just with her eyes but in spoken words, I have to touch you, Ira, I have to see who you really are in that secret place of yours, then I would have had to take Sam into my arms, even on that night, even though I did love Fiona already and even though Sam was married. I would have been unable to make a different choice, even if some rational, loyal, honest, omnisciently considerate and caring part of me said it was wrong. Because I loved Sam, too, and it wasn't in the same way as I loved Fiona, if it might seem to some rigorously rational and honest and loyal and considerate and caring outside observer that it was a lesser love, not worthy of the name even and certainly not worthy of expression, and more than that, if it seemed that it was a love that was forever preempted because somebody else already loved me at that moment, I have not answer for that except all that I've already said in this story of mine and all that still remains to be said. I can't reason this thing out. That's always the big mistake, trying to believe these things yield to reason. And as far as my friend Harry is concerned, all I can say is that I did everything I was capable of to avoid this, but ultimately it was Sam's choice as well. I'm not happy with all that. Really I'm not. For the sake of Fiona and Harry and the structures of society and the cornerstone of Western civilization or whatever else might be at stake here, I'm not happy with this. I'm not happy either at having to keep that kind of secret. But I struggle always, always, with that other unhappiness: the vision of a universe where love is something you get one of, where this other yearning, if you have it, is never to be expressed fully, after a certain point, and if you do, there are dreadful secrets to keep.

–Robert Olen Butler, They Whisper

///

...I must face this about myself. If a woman wanted me, if there are no lies or coercions between us, if there is no persuasion other than the implicit persuasion of our two ontological whisperings and our two inclinations to listen, then I must say yes to that and it has always been that way for me....I must say yes to a woman who wants me and who wants me to want her....

–Robert Olen Butler, They Whisper

///

Cosmology (8th Century Sanskrit)

The goddess Lakshmi
loves to make love to Vishnu
from on top
looking down she sees in his navel
a lotus
and on it Brahma the god
but she can’t bear to stop
so she puts her hand
over Vishnu’s right eye
which is the sun
and night comes on
and the lotus closes
with Brahma inside

 –Anonymous, 8th Century Sanskrit, translated by W. S. Merwin and J. Moussaieff Masson (East Window: The Asian Translations)

///

Untitled (Sanskrit, Date Unknown)

 I like sleeping with somebody
     different

     often

it’s nicest when my husband is
     in a foreign country

     and there’s rain in the streets at night
     and wind

      and nobody

 –Anonymous Sanskrit, date unknown, translated by W. S. Merwin and J. Moussaieff Masson (East Window: The Asian Translations)

///

 ...the couplet was regarded as a plain, ordinary kind of verse, in contrast to the stanzaic forms used so commonly for long narratives and to blank verse, which was best suited for tragedy and epic. The couplet was "nearest prose"; which is to say, our own view of it as artificial and hifalutin is exactly contrary to the view held by those who practiced it and who were trying to do the same thing, roughly speaking, for the poetry of their time that Pound and Williams did for the poetry of theirs.

–Hayden Carruth, "Three Notes on the Versewriting of Alexander Pope"

///

Mystical poetry can be a subject for study, but in its essential nature it is not something to locate or describe within a cultural context. It is a way to open the heart, as a Sufi master, or any enlightened being, is a door to the radiant depth of the self.

I obviously am not trying to place Rumi in his thirteenth century locus. That is fine work, and I am grateful for those who do it. My more grandiose project is to free his text into its essence.

–Coleman Barks, The Essential Rumi

///

I wanted to use a torch as a great pen, with the whole vast heaven as my copy-paper, to write lines that would fill the sky, so the whole earth could see my poems from any place wherever....I use poetry to speak to the world.

–Huang Xiang, translated by Andrew Emerson

///

I am a wild beast hunted down
I am a captured wild beast
I am a wild beast trampled by wild beasts
I am a wild beast trampling wild beasts

This age viciously seizes me
With squinting eyes
Its feet stomp on the bridge of my nose
Tearing
Biting
Gnawing
Gnawing until barely a bone of me is left

Even though barely a bone is left
I want this detestable age to choke on me

–Huang Xiang 1968, “Wild Beasts,” translated by Andrew Emerson

///

Tradutori – traditori. (Translators are traitors.)

–An Italian saying

///

I’ve seen you get out of your bath a thousand times
My naked woman
You’ve swept away my confusion  my anxiety
Your skin radiates a ruddy electric glow
Your hair sparkles with tousled black
Rebellious
Brilliance
A captivating
Brilliance
You have captured me
My naked woman

In your embrace I pull open fiery
Days and fiery nights
Wildly drinking in your star-light honey
And your sunshine wine
With the verdant ardor of seventeen springtimes
You surround me
You have overwhelmed me
My naked woman

Your resilient breasts aroused swell
Your clarion thighs pour out mystic songs of joy
Pulsating your hot wild blood-red
Tumescence
Unfolds towards me without shame or guilt
Destroying me
A thousand times, ten thousand times
You are the warmest scarlet
Honey
My naked woman.

–Huang Xiang, “My Naked Woman,” translated by Andrew Emerson

///

Poetry is an endeavor we value for a very few, solitary achievements, not for some broad, shared effort. I do not think it is every possible to say intelligently what the state of poetry is. English-language poetry being written today and in the coming few years will be valued a hundred years from now—if it is valued at all—for the work of, at most, a dozen poets, and more likely only half that number. All the rest will be background noise, of interest only to specialists.

–Robert Daseler, Poetry, "Letters to the Editor"

///

Kids in distressed families are great repositories of silence and carry in their bodies whole arctic wastelands of words not to be uttered, stories not to be told. Or to be told in sketchiest form—merely brushed by. It’s an irony that airing these dramas is often a family's chief taboo. Yet the bristling agony secrecy causes can only be relieved by talk—hours and hours of unmuzzled talk, the recounting of stories. Who listens is almost beside the point, so long as the watching eyes remain lit, and the head tilts at the angle indicating attention and care.

Without such talk by the kids of these families, there's usually a grave sense of personal fault, of failing to rescue those beloveds lost or doomed. That silence ticks out inside its bearer the constant small sting of indictment—what if, what if, what if; why didn’t I, why didn’t I, why didn’t I...

–Mary Karr, Cherry

///

There are war stories and tales of survival, there are political memoirs and confessions of faith, but in all of Western literature there are only a very few personal narratives that honestly and frankly explore the intimate experience of making love—hardly any to which an author has been willing to sign his name. Although sex is one of the perplexing, joyous, difficult and transcendent experiences of life, although studies indicate that people think about sex dozens of times every living day, hardly anyone has come forward to write about it intimately except behind the mask of fiction.

–Richard Rhodes, Making Love: An Erotic Odyssey

///

But I also survived, in the years after my rescue and well into adulthood, by using my sexuality to structure and confine the extensive psychological damage the years of abuse had inflicted on me. That is, I worked my way through the damage not only with my mind, but also with my body. How could it be otherwise when mind and body are one? Abuse is written on the body as well as on the soul. (Fortunately, so is the abundance of our common humanity; so is love. Who has never felt the offering of another person’s body as a gift of grace?) And however unfit for the parlor, such survival skills ought to be shared. The taboo against writing about one’s personal sexual experience cuts us off from valuable knowledge. In Making Love I share what I learned. You may or may not find the experience comfortable. "The loves of flint and iron"—Emerson again—"are naturally a little rougher than those of the nightingale and the rose."

–Richard Rhodes, Making Love: An Erotic Odyssey

///

…if a work does not compel us, it is untranslatable.…

–Yves Bonnefoy

///

Once again, his body was the measure of all things: the cellar, his bowels; the roof, his scalp; the stairs, his spine.…The whole city, he began to see, could analogized to his flesh, bone, and blood. and why should that be so surprising? When an architect turned his mind to the building of a city, where would he look for inspiration? To the flesh where he’d lived since birth. It was the first model for any creator.…There wasn’t an edifice in any street in London that hadn’t begun somewhere in the private city of an architect’s anatomy, and all Gentle had to do was open his mind to that fact and the districts were his, running back to swell the assembly in his head.

–Clive Barker, Imajica

///

I search a face
for obstacles to genocide
I search beyond the dead
and
driven by imperfect visions
of the living
yes and no
I come and go
back to the eyes
of anyone
who talks to me

–June Jordan, from "Poem For A Young Poet," Kissing God Goodbye

///

Here do I discover
the humility
the miracle of suffering
without surrender
the miracle of suffering
without defeat

–June Jordan, from "Lebanon, Lebanon," Kissing God Goodbye

///

To witness the moment when pain causes a reversion to the pre-language of cries and groans is to witness the destruction of language; but conversely, to be present when a person moves up out of that pre-language and projects the facts of sentience into speech is almost to have been permitted to be present at the birth of language itself.

–Elaine Scarry, The Body In Pain

///

If the deity is the father writ large, then this divine masculinity is by no means simply a confirmation of human masculinity. It is at the same time a fundamental threat and challenge to it.… Indeed…in at least on respect men’s relationship with God is even more problematic than women’s, for on a heterosexual model of intimate relationships, women are more appropriate objects of divine desire than are men. One way of escaping this problem is by symbolically displacing male tensions and contradictions onto women. The otherness of women is exaggerated to minimize the ways men are made into others in a system which validates male authority.

–Howard Eilberg-Schwartz, God’s Phallus

///

Circumcision has the distinction of making sure that a man is never naked of God’s commandments.

–Howard Eilberg-Schwartz, God’s Phallus

///

To be a man of God involves imagining oneself as a woman, at least when the divine-human relationship is considered analogous to a marriage, as it was in ancient Israel and as it continued to be in late antique Judaism. This process of feminization, which is partial and undeveloped in Scripture, was given greater articulation by the rabbis, the late antique interpreters of Judaism. The rabbis understood full well the fact that in the relationship with God, men must assume the position of wives. Consequently, their readings of Scripture emphasized the ways in which the patriarchs were portrayed as women with respect to God. But the sages also saw the implications of this feminization for themselves. They, too, were wives of God. At times they read Scripture as if they imagined themselves as women, looking to female models for how they should behave. And we shall see that for the sages, as for their predecessors, the thought of seeing God was a decidedly erotic experience.

–Howard Eilberg-Schwartz, God’s Phallus

///

Circumcision, then, [according to the Midrash] completes a man and makes him ready for a theophany. Through the act of circumcision, one may stand in the presence of God. This merit is deserved not only because circumcision is a sign of the covenant, but also because men may meet God only as women. And circumcision makes them desirable women.

–Howard Eilberg-Schwartz, God’s Phallus

///

His insistence on his private voice, on evolving his subjectivity through poetry, has been a great risk.

–Khaled Mattawa, "Introduction," Without An Alphabet, Without A Face: Selected Poems of Saadi Youssef

///

Poetry can only be an exploration of ideology, not a means of expressing belief in it. Reluctant to declare his ideology as the way out of alienation, Youssef shows how his ideology, transmuted within poetry, generates feelings of empathy and solidarity. For Youssef then, the commitment to justice and freedom stand beside his poetry, not above it. His political values, manifested in active participation in social struggle, are in reality fulfilling his abiding devotion to beauty. Justice and compassion in Youssef’s verse are presented in a sensual manner that symbolizes his individualized appreciation of harmony and balance. They are aesthetic choices first and foremost.

–Khaled Mattawa, "Introduction," Without An Alphabet, Without A Face: Selected Poems of Saadi Youssef

///

As a form of training…it is important that the poet develop a strong bond with life, to be able to observe and able to choose his subject matter.… Afterwards, he can abstract things by abstracting coincidences, and symbolize them. This time of observation (for a poet) is an elementary process akin to learning reading and writing.

–Saadi Youssef, Without An Alphabet, Without A Face: Selected Poems of Saadi Youssef

///

.… The only true motive for putting poetry into a fresh language [translating it] must be to endow a fresh nation, as far as possible, with one more possession beauty. Poetry not being an exact science, literality of rendering is altogether secondary to this chief aim. I say literality—not fidelity, which is by no means the same thing. When literality can be combined with what is thus the primary condition of success, the translator is fortunate, and must strive his utmost to unite them; when such object can only be attained by paraphrase, that is his only path.

…. The task of the translator (and with all humility be it spoken) is one of self-denial. Often would he avail himself of any special grace of his own idiom and speech, if only his will belonged to him; often would some cadence serve him but for his author’s structure—some structure but for his author’s cadence; often the beautiful turn of a stanza must be weakened to adopt some rhyme which will tally, and he sees the poet reveling in abundance of language where himself is scantily supplied. Now he would slight the matter for the music, and now the music for the matter; but no, he must deal to each alike. Sometimes, too, a flaw in the work galls him, and he would fain remove it, doing for the poet that which his age denied him; but no,—it is not in the bond. His path is like that of Aladdin through the enchanted vaults: many are the precious fruits and flowers which he must pass by unheeded in search for the lamp alone; happy if at last, when brought to light, it does not prove that his old lamp has been exchanged for a new one,—glittering indeed to the eye, but scarcely of the same virtue nor with the same genius at its summons.

–Dante Gabriel Rossetti, Preface to The Early Italian Poets

///

As long as race is something only applied to non-white people, as long as white people are not racially seen and named, they/we function as a human norm. Other people are raced, we are just people.

–Richard Dyer, White

///

There is no more powerful position than that of being ‘just’ human. The claim to power is the claim to speak for the commonality of humanity. Raced people can’t do that—they can only speak for their race. But non-raced people can, for they do not represent the interests of a race. The point of seeing the racing of whites is to dislodge them/us from the position of power, with all the inequities, oppression, privileges and sufferings in its train, dislodging them/us by undercutting the authority with which they/we speak and act in and on the world.

–Richard Dyer, White

///

I seem from a very early age to have had a feeling for non-white people, a feeling something like kinship; yet there were moments when, for some reason or other, I suddenly realized that I really was not kin, and it was thus that I really realized I was white.

–Richard Dyer, White

///

White people need to learn to see themselves as white, to see their particularity. In other words, whiteness needs to be made strange.

–Richard Dyer, White

///

The sexual dramas of white men have to do with not being able to resist the drives or struggling to master them. The drives are typically characterized as dark.…But there need not be explicit or even implied racial reference, it is enough that there is darkness. This furnishes the heterosexual desire that will rescue whites from sterility while separating such desire from the what whites aspire to. Dark desires are part of the story of whiteness, but as what the whiteness of whiteness has to struggle against. Thus it is that the whiteness of white men resides in the tragic quality of their giving way to darkness and the heroism of their channeling or resisting it.

–Richard Dyer, White

///

Small Fundamental Essay

What many people fail to understand
about the art and science of mechanics
is that you may know perfectly what happens
under the hood of your car when you turn on
the ignition, and you may comprehend
to a nicety how the combination of pump
and pressure tank and heating coils produces
hot water when you turn the tap, and yet
the wonder never ceases. That this can be
–and is–is what bestirs the mind and heart.
Is this a faith? It never starts a war
nor rips a seam out of a living city,
it needs no ghastly hierophant hung up
dead on a cross to speak for us. But yes,
it is a faith. Faith in the miracle of the
possible, in the peaceful knowledge of what is true.

–Hayden Carruth

///

In our quieter moments, Natasha told me about the men who had taken her picture. She hadn’t minded any of it except that they couldn’t explain why they liked one thing over another. They had always known exactly how they wanted her to look, but none of them could give her a reason. Why did they prefer her leg raised this way and not that, why squatting from behind of holding her hand in a certain position? Some of the positions had been practically identical, yet they had insisted on them. The only explanation they offered was that it looked good or that it was sexy. And yet she never felt that way about men. She never cared how they looked or what side she was viewing them from.

—You don’t care how I look?

—You look how you look. If you bent over, it wouldn’t make any difference to me.

I bent over.

—That doesn’t make any difference?

—It looks stupid. But what if I bend over? Does it look stupid?

—No, it looks good.

—Why is that?

—It just does.

—You can’t explain it?

I thought it had to do with the forbidden. The attraction to the forbidden in the forbidden. The forbiddenest. But it still wasn’t much of an answer.

–David Bezmogis, "Natasha" – (both characters are teenagers)

///

I only desire one lover, yet I also desire infinite possibilities with this love.

–Jenny Boully

///

The first duty of the writer is the rectification of names—to name things properly, for, as Kung-fu Tze said, "All wisdom is rooted in learning to call things by the right name."

–Sam Hamill, "The Necessity To Speak"

///

The true poet gives up the self. The I of my poem is not me. It is the first person impersonal, it is permission for you to enter the experience which we name Poem.

–Sam Hamill, "The Necessity To Speak"

///

Grammar is no more than a logical organization for the presentation of thoughts and feelings. "Structure," [Wendell] Berry says, "is intelligibility." And, "A sentence is both the opportunity and limit of thought—what we have to think with, and what we have to think in. It is, moreover, a feelable thought, a thought that impresses its sense not just on our understanding, but on our hearing, our sense of rhythm and proportion. It is a pattern of felt sense."

To permit our schools to neglect the study of grammar is to deny our children the opportunity to explore the limits of their own thoughts and feelings.

–Sam Hamill, "Orthodox, Heterodox, Paradox"

///

There have been stupid, poorly informed leaders throughout history. But seldom if ever has the world been afforded, as we are now with the unfolding disasters in Iraq and Israel, the knowledge of this savage stupidity and misinformation on a real-time basis, with no foreseeable end. As the Englishman said when the American asked him to admire the velocity of the water pouring over the Niagara Falls, "What is to stop it?"

–Alexander Cockburn, "Stupid Leaders, Useless Spies, Angry World," The Nation, May 17, 2004

///

Barely a year ago, our troops watched looters and rioters destroy Iraqi cultural artifacts. Donald Rumsfeld rationalized is as a kind of freedom. Coalition forces were pictured amid the smashed ruins of Saddam’s palace, smoking his cigars, their feet on the tables, carrying off "souvenirs." Fast-forward to now: [Iraqi] teenage boys rejoincing as an American Humvee is blown apart and dividing up the possessions of dead US soldiers for "souvenirs."

These are crude pairings; indeed, I offer the comparisons not as a direct line of cause and effect or of right and wrong but rather to study the ungovernable yet wholly predictable "blowback" of war, of repression, of trauma. There is nothing "collateral" about the disruption of daily life and the untold deaths of civilians. We must re-evaluate the "liberation" we are wreaking, the "assistance" we are waging, the "pounding" we are delivering for failure to cooperate. We need to know how many mercenaries we have "outsourced" this war to; we need to know how many Iraqis have died—soldiers, insurgents, terrorists, civilians, whatever you want to call them. We cannot shield ourselves from the respectful regard of our own dead, even in "the interests of privacy." There can be no unconsidered dead in the publicly sponsored violence we call war. We need to know the real size of this enterprise, for the blowback of grief will be thusly proportioned.

–Patricia J. Williams, "For Their Own Good," The Nation, May 17, 2004

///

And there’s the real question: If the government is going to regulate speech, where’s the line and who’s going to draw it? Is it at the least-common-denominator that makes all media safe for 5-year-olds? Is it at the church door that makes all media safe for church ladies? Is it at my car door so I can still listen to [Howard] Stern? Is the line going to be drawn just on broadcast or will it extend to cable and satellite—and the Internet? Will the censored by just shock jocks—or newsmakers or bloggers?

I couldn’t say it better than Michael Powell—the old, freedom-loving Michael Powell—did in 1999 when he accepted the Freedom of Speech Award (which one assumes is now hanging in his bathroom): "I have gained a deep and profound respect for the wisdom of having an unwavering principle that stands at the summit of the Constitution, and holds: ‘Government shall make no law abridging the freedom of speech.’… Benevolent or not, we did not sign away to a Philosopher-King the responsibility to determine for us, like a caring parent, what messages we should and should not hear."

–Jeff Jarvis, "F*cked By The F*CC: Can the FCC Shut Howard Up?" The Nation, May 17, 2004

///

In her mind, Hester was running in the fields, out on the west hill. She was wearing that old peach nightgown she loved so much. Whatever happened to that? The breeze was warm on her arms, and she saw their house in the distance, its windows lit from inside like golden eyes, like fires burning. She wanted to live like that, like melodies and fire. She wondered if she could.

–Randolyn Zinn, "Rise E Bisi"

///

Modern masturbation is profane. It is not just something that putatively makes those who do it tired, crippled, mad, or blind but an act with serious ethical implications. It is that part of human sexual life where potentially unlimited pleasure meets social restraint; where habit and the promise of just-one-more-time struggle with the dictates of conscience and good sense; where fantasy silences, if only for a moment, the reality principle; and where the autonomous self escapes from the erotically barren here and now into a luxuriant world of its own creation. It hovers between abjection and fulfillment.

Well before and well after 1712, the body was thought to suffer from bad behavior. Medicine had always been something of a moral guide, a kind of ethics of the flesh. That role increased dramatically in the eighteenth century as moral norms became, at least in progressive circles, rooted more in nature and taught in school, the world of physicians and pedagogues, and less in divine authority and preached in church, the province of priests or pastors. In this context, it is not surprising that cultural anxieties were translated into disease: diseases of civilization, for example, caused by a variety of bad things—too much luxury, too much mental activity and not enough exercise, too much sympathy or too much novel reading, which stirs up the body and its nerves, or diseases that followed upon too much sexual activity.… The fundamental question, therefore, is not why sometime around 1712 masturbation came to be regarded as a medical problem or why around 1920 it stopped being thought to cause disease. More puzzling is why solitary sex in particular became so troubling a moral problem at precisely the time when sexual pleasure itself was enjoying ever more secular approval.

Masturbation is the sexuality of modernity and of the bourgeoisie who created it. It is the first truly democratic sexuality.

The Enlightenment project of liberation—the coming into adulthood of humanity—made the most secret, private, seemingly harmless, and most difficult to detect of sexual acts the centerpiece of a program for policing the imagination, desire and the self that modernity itself had unleashed.

–Thomas W. Laqueur, Solitary Sex: A Cultural History of Masturbation

///

It’s true the charm may lie
somewhat
in the subject such as gardens
wedding songs love affairs
against these few will speak and all
at one time
may have hoped—
but there is your bending
neck and the small hollow at the base
of your long back
and no charm
other

song likes its own delights and even sadness
in some modes
charms
those whose hearts have moved
so

what to do with the soul
its many
motions

–Sappho, "Fragment 103," translated by Maureen N. McLane

///

There can be no doubt that many poems—even many great poems—would gain by being translated into the very language they were written in. This brings up the problem as to whether it is art or the artist that matters, the individual or the product. If it be the final result that matters and that shall give delight, then we are justified in taking a famous poet’s all but perfect poem, and, in the light of the criticism of another age, making it perfect by excision, substitution, or addition. Wordsworth’s "Ode on Immortality" is a great poem, but its far from being a perfect poem. It could be rehandled to advantage.

–Fernando Pessoa, "The Art of Translation"

///

My bewilderment and rebellion before American education were enhanced by looking back to Chinese models. Confucian education never required the study of anything but poetry, and it approached that mostly by being a poet. All scholars were poets. There was no division between the critical and the creative. None but the poets were scholars and none but poets attempted to write on poetry. It did not make for Aristotelian analysis, but it vitalized the whole field of knowledge to the creatively minded. This was the way I wanted to approach Western knowledge. And found it would not work, for there was no tradition like that in American education. I was distressed at the lack of unifying principles. I could build no bridge from one classroom to another, just as I could build no bridge from the New Hotel into the mental Utopia.

–Younghill Kang, East Goes West: The Making of an Oriental Yankee

///

–And so the marriage. For him, it was an object now,
an image of a marriage, nothing more: the living marrow of it
slipped out long ago, and what was left
were two extraordinary dolls. But she
still rouged their cheeks, and laved them
with yolk and with musk and with sensual gels
that heat when breathed on, and she dressed them
in their silks, and she paraded them
through Mardi Gras, through New Year’s Eve,
and they sang, and they waved to their mutual friends,
through years of anniversaries.

–Albert Goldbarth, "The Polarized Responses"

///

It wasn’t enough he asked her
into his bed. It wasn’t enough,
her yes. And then a night
of transcendental bestial sounds
of pleasure, and the formless
sighs of subsequent contentment
—not enough. There had to be
the rich, rotunda-filling details
of "I love you." It was the words they loved.
Everything follows from that.

–Albert Goldbarth, "Mouth"

///

We must not cede the power to witness what is happening to us, to know how we are seen, to oversee our representation. Without the freedom, we must recognize ourselves in the awful words spoken by the despairing family of one Iraqi man who has disappeared into US custody: "It’s because they have absolute force. No one sees what they do."

–Patricia J. Williams, "To See or Not to See," The Nation, June 28, 2004

///

[Adultery] promises no new beginnings, no second chance for monogamy, for the "good marriage" this time, with the good wife and good husband in which no one is ever insecure, ever needy beyond the embrace of home, ever even intrigued; in which everyone is happy, while happiness wreaks its impossible demands. Yet adultery rarely brings absolute rupture. Most adulterers don’t leave home for wedded bliss with their lover. What adultery brings is something harder, a confrontation with the lie and, beyond the bric-a-brac of forbidden love, with plain old desire in a monogamy system in which sex is currency, withheld as punishment, doled out as reward, or sometimes just another thing on a To Do list that is already too long.

Of course, the lie is more comforting than its unmasking, and so the "other woman," ghoul of married women’s fears, is a horned thing, symbol of failure, delusion, selfishness. The dark angel, she is as necessary to the totem of the ideal wife as the hellfire is to heaven. But is it reasonable, or just an article of faith in the marriage religion, that apostates must all be cynics or manipulators? A woman I know, single, 50-ish and by chance or design long involved with married men, answered the question this way:

"The fact is a lot of us are single and the longer we insist on that the smaller the pool becomes of single interesting men. Now, the boxes lined up conventionally for someone like me are celibacy, computer dating, husband-hunting, broken heart. No thank you. So I see these men, and let’s just say we engage in a free love. I don’t expect them to leave their wives. I want their interest and their care, intimately, mentally, and I offer them the same. They go home to their wives. I don’t know what they say or do about that, and it’s not my business. They love their wives, or need them, or need their families, or need the image of themselves that comes along with twenty-five years of marriage or whatever even if love is dead, and maybe it was never alive in the first place. Or maybe it’s good, but how much can it give? Life demands a lot, you know, and sometimes a person just needs to be weak. Or just needs, wants, a different kind of loving. We act as if comfort were evil—and curiosity, God forbid! For the time I’m with these men I know something deep and loving occurs. Apart from everything else, I am their intimate friend. We’re talking years here. The Dr. Phils of the world would say that I’m a fool. The gay men that I know get it completely. The women mostly I don’t discuss this with. It isn’t perfect, but nothing is. And I’d be lying to say I never want for more. In the pie-in-the-sky there’s always the ‘great love,’ the soul mate and comrade and lover combined. It’s a wish; it happens or it doesn’t, and, let’s face it, most of the time it doesn’t. But we live in a tyranny of the couple. Only single people understand this. And I guess what I resent most is the assumption that there is only way for love, and if you haven’t found it, or if your man ‘strays’ or if you are the one he’s ‘straying’ with, then you’ve failed. I don’t think these guys’ wives have failed any more than I think the men have or I have. The supposed experts on love can hawk all the stuff they want about commitment, denial, avoidance, and people can lap it up and repeat it back to their single friends and their children. But at the end of the day there’re still all these broken marriages, all these broken hearts, all these needs unmet. The rules for love everlasting are a bit like the rules for making it in the opportunity society, where really nothing is equal and nothing is fair."

Maybe instead of asking whether marriage can be saved, we might think about how love is achieved, and not just couple-love, contract-love, but love in common too?

–JoAnn Wypijewski, "Can Marriage Be Saved," The Nation, July 5 2004

///

For me, imagination is synonymous with discovery. To imagine, to discover, to carry our bit of light to the living penumbra where all the infinite possibilities, forms, and numbers exist. I do not believe in creation but in discovery, and I don’t believe in the seated artist but in the one who is walking the road. The imagination is a spiritual apparatus, a luminous explorer of the world it discovers. The imagination fixes and gives clear life to fragments of the invisible reality where man is stirring.

The mission of the poet is just that—to give life (animar), in the exact sense of the word: to give soul. Because I am a true poet, and will remain so until my death, I will never stop flagellating myself with the disciplines, and never give up hope that someday by body will run with green or yellow blood. Anything is better than to remain seated in the window looking out on the same landscape. The light of any poet is contradiction. I haven’t tried to force my position on anyone—that would be unworthy of poetry. Poetry doesn’t need skilled practitioners, she needs lovers, and she lays down brambles and shards of glass for the hands that search for her with love.

–Federico García Lorca, quoted in Harper’s, September 2004

 

Photo credits, from left to right: Movement One: Creative Coalition, The Pedestal Magazine, BeechTree Images.

This website was last updated on: Saturday, February 16, 2008
Website design and content copyright 2006 by Richard Jeffrey Newman.